Hi To All,
Sorry for not replying sooner have been away.
Am very much looking forward to being part of maven project and hope to give
some good code back to the community.
Look forward to working with you all and perhaps meeting you all at
ApacheCon in Dublin,
Chris
On 27/03/06, Brett Porter
Forwarding FYI. I'm pretty sure this is an area that interests a lot of you.
For those interested please feel free to come and discuss it on the cargo
lists.
For a quick summary of what this is about, check: http://tinyurl.com/le5mq
Thanks
-Vincent
-Original Message-
From: Vincent
+1
Vincent
2006/3/30, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-javadoc-plugin 2.0-20060330.003327-1 (r389939)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
+1
Vincent
2006/3/30, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.1-20060330.024351-1 (r389968)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mercredi 29 mars 2006 06:45
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Issues while trying to implement an aggregated report for the
Clover plugin
[snip]
3) Problem of having multiple reports in one plugin. In
Hi,
I'd like to determine what the best course of action is, so figured we
should take a straw poll.
Maven 2.0.3 contained a major regression, that caused certain paths to
incorrectly be interpolated in the POM (MNG-2183).
I have fixed it, and also a regression since 2.0 (MNG-2054). I have
You might also be interested by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184. It
would be good to confirm if this is indeed a bug and if so possibly make it
part of 2.0.4. Not sure of the importance compared to other things; I just
know that it's a major issue for the clover plugin that is currently
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-javadoc-plugin 2.0-20060330.003327-1 (r389939)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11138styleName=Htmlversion=12329
* [MJAVADOC-3] - plugin should honor proxy settings
* [MJAVADOC-8] -
+1
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Please vote to release the maven compiler plugin 2.0.1
Snapshot has been deployed as maven-compiler-plugin-2.0.1-20060328.105412-2
Issues fixed
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11130fixfor=12178
Compiler plugin ignores includes /
+1, somewhat important plugin...:)
On 3/30/06, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Please vote to release the maven compiler plugin 2.0.1
Snapshot has been deployed as
maven-compiler-plugin-2.0.1-20060328.105412-2
Issues fixed
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.1-20060330.024351-1 (r389968)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127styleName=Htmlversion=12490
* [MCHECKSTYLE-33] - Patch provides ability to control whether
It's actually MNG-2186.
I would prefer (b). 2.0.3 had a release candidate for weeks and no one
reported this bug. Short circuiting the process is unjustified IMO.
2.0.4 could be released on Sunday with the normal process.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Perham wrote:
It's actually MNG-2186.
I would prefer (b). 2.0.3 had a release candidate for weeks and no one
reported this bug. Short circuiting the process is unjustified IMO.
2.0.4 could be released on Sunday with the normal process.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter
Hi,
A question about the configuration mappings Does the
mapping of Maven project properties to Mojo fields also
work for any complex objects used to configure the plugin?
In other words, in the following code, will the project
field of the ComplexObject parameter be assigned ?
I would prefer (b). 2.0.3 had a release candidate for weeks and no one
reported this bug.
Funnily enough, the first to find it was Dan, who said that he was using
the release candidate in production :) Obviously not the last one...
Short circuiting the process is unjustified IMO.
2.0.4
Hi,
It appears I introduced two regressions in the 2.0.3 release. See
MNG-2054 and MNG-2186 for more information. Since they have potentially
huge impact on our users (esp. MNG-2186), I'd like to release a fixed
version (2.0.4) quickly, to regain a stable base for moving forward.
So, here's
Online report :
http://grmcredit-int.drkw.net:8081/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/145/buildId/473
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:23:54 +0100
Finished at: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:24:11 +0100
Total
sorry every one, i did you use it in production, but not this particular
usecase where my
group begin to write JNI unittest starting 2.0.3 ;-) Next time, I will be
more carefull with
what I announce ;-)
-D
On 3/30/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer (b). 2.0.3 had a
+1
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Hi,
It appears I introduced two regressions in the 2.0.3 release. See
MNG-2054 and MNG-2186 for more information. Since they have potentially
huge impact on our users (esp. MNG-2186), I'd like to release a fixed
version (2.0.4) quickly, to regain a stable
Hmm, what is it?
Atom Continuum a écrit :
Online report :
http://grmcredit-int.drkw.net:8081/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/145/buildId/473
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:23:54 +0100
Finished
Hi,
Is it possible to have a Maven.addArtifact() method added?
Someone reported a bug on the clover plugin saying that a dependency was
missing on one project. Here's the code that we currently have:
Set set = new HashSet( this.project.getDependencyArtifacts() );
set.add(
+1
-Vincent
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: jeudi 30 mars 2006 18:15
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Maven 2.0.4 release (fix regressions from 2.0.3)
Hi,
It appears I introduced two regressions in the 2.0.3 release. See
MNG-2054
I'm just trying to build m2's trunk locally so I can submit a patch.
I followed the directions, but there seem to be something awry.
First of all, each one of the integration test takes a bloody
eternity to run. Like a minute. Second, it0094 is (still) wedged
after 20 minutes! It's alive,
+1
John Casey wrote:
Hi,
It appears I introduced two regressions in the 2.0.3 release. See
MNG-2054 and MNG-2186 for more information. Since they have potentially
huge impact on our users (esp. MNG-2186), I'd like to release a fixed
version (2.0.4) quickly, to regain a stable base for
That code looks fine, it also works in Cobertura. Can you get more
details about the dependency?
- Brett
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have a Maven.addArtifact() method added?
Someone reported a bug on the clover plugin saying that a dependency was
missing on one project.
I would suggest patching against the branch - there is a definite slow
down on trunk at the moment.
As for the wedge - does that happen repeatedly?
- Brett
Gordon Henriksen wrote:
I'm just trying to build m2's trunk locally so I can submit a patch. I
followed the directions, but there seem to
Deng, was this intentional? It no longer does the modification check
John added in MWAR-26.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: epunzalan
Date: Sun Mar 19 18:41:00 2006
New Revision: 387118
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387118view=rev
Log:
PR: MWAR-20
Submitted by: Maria Odea Ching
Some questions:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: epunzalan
Date: Tue Mar 28 19:21:05 2006
New Revision: 389663
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389663view=rev
Log:
PR: MWAR-12
Submitted by: Brian Topping, John Tolentino
Allowed resource filtering to war plugin
+/**
+
Never mind, seems have since been fixed.
Brett Porter wrote:
Deng, was this intentional? It no longer does the modification check
John added in MWAR-26.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: epunzalan
Date: Sun Mar 19 18:41:00 2006
New Revision: 387118
URL:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: epunzalan
Date: Thu Mar 23 22:49:10 2006
New Revision: 388412
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388412view=rev
Log:
PR: MWAR-7
Submitted by: Maria Odea Ching
Fixed the bug by adjusting the artifact filename references in case there is
an artifact
The normal convention for this is to assign a classifier and attach it
instead.
I can see that you might not want to install at all though, so I'll
leave this intact and rename to primaryArtifact instead, which I feel
is clearer.
- Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: aramirez
Date: Wed Mar
On Mar 30, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I would suggest patching against the branch - there is a definite
slow down on trunk at the moment.
AOK—I'll do that.
As for the wedge - does that happen repeatedly?
Ugh, it finished this time, in about 2 minutes or so. I am not
Hi,
Just wanted to float the idea of using the embedder for the ITs. It's
been discussed before but now I think it's getting close to possible
with the work on the embedder-refactor branch. The CLI uses the embedder
on the branch and everything works.
The subtlety is that it will not be the
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design Best Practices (34 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-612
MNG-2129generated source repo page is misleading when added to the general
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-report-plugin 2.0-20060331.032648-2 (r390304)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11222styleName=Htmlversion=12481
* [MSUREFIREREP-2] - test failures causes report not to be generated
* [MSUREFIREREP-9]
Jesse Kuhnert +1 (non-binding)
On 3/30/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-report-plugin 2.0-20060331.032648-2 (r390304)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-war-plugin 2.0-20060331.041208-2 (r390317)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150styleName=Htmlversion=12160
* [MWAR-1] - war:exploded removes content of .class files
* [MWAR-3] - war:war launched from parent
+1. I validated that MNG-2054 is fixed in my sample and real project.
Thanks for fixing the regression.
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 11:15 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Maven 2.0.4 release (fix regressions
Welcome, Jesse!
+1: John, Carlos, Lukas, Vincent M, Vincent S, Edwin, Stephane,
Emmanuel, Kenney, Arnaud, Fabrizio, Brian
non-binding +1: Prasad, Brian K. Wallace
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I think we all agree we need more keen people helping out with plugins!
Jesse has been contributing
Welcome, Deng!
+1: Brett, Jason, John, Carlos, Lukas, Vincent M, Vincent S, Edwin,
Stephane, Emmanuel, Arnaud, Fabrizio
non-binding +1: Brian K. Wallace
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Like John, Deng has been helping out on the users list, plugins and the
repository manager for some time. I'd
Welcome, John!
+1: Brett, Jason, John, Carlos, Lukas, Vincent M, Vincent S, Edwin,
Stephane, Emmanuel, Arnaud, Fabrizio, Brian
non-binding +1: Brian K. Wallace
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
John has been helping out on the users list, plugins and the repository
manager for some time. I'd like to
Please amend that to 2.0-20060331.052706-3 (r390329).
- Brett
Brett Porter wrote:
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-war-plugin 2.0-20060331.041208-2 (r390317)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150styleName=Htmlversion=12160
*
Thanks everyone! :-)
Regards,
John
Brett Porter wrote:
Welcome, John!
+1: Brett, Jason, John, Carlos, Lukas, Vincent M, Vincent S, Edwin,
Stephane, Emmanuel, Arnaud, Fabrizio, Brian
non-binding +1: Brian K. Wallace
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
John has been helping out on the users list,
Thanks everyone :)
-Deng
Brett Porter wrote:
Welcome, Deng!
+1: Brett, Jason, John, Carlos, Lukas, Vincent M, Vincent S, Edwin,
Stephane, Emmanuel, Arnaud, Fabrizio
non-binding +1: Brian K. Wallace
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Like John, Deng has been helping out on the users list, plugins
+1
-Vincent
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vendredi 31 mars 2006 05:30
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release Maven Surefire Report plugin 2.0
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-report-plugin 2.0-20060331.032648-2
+1
-Vincent
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vendredi 31 mars 2006 06:16
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release Maven WAR plugin 2.0
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-war-plugin 2.0-20060331.041208-2 (r390317)
[ ] +1
[ ]
Hello everyone
Is it possible to run tests using maven-surefire-plugin when the tests
are in a JAR file ?
I can see that SurefirePlugin uses
org.apache.maven.surefire.battery.DirectoryBattery exclusively and
presume that it's not possible to use tests in JAR.
DirectoryBattery uses
Non-binding (user vote) : +1.
I prefer to say +10 because some nice features have been included
(specially MWAR-8).
Thanks a lot,
- Olivier
-Message d'origine-
De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 31 mars 2006 06:16
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : [vote]
48 matches
Mail list logo
