Hi all,
This is an email that Jason sent me to give you a better understanding
of the previous email I sent. Please feel free to comment, question or add
suggestions to the effort.
Take care,
Jeremy
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason Van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 11,
Cool, thanks for posting that.
Jason.
On 13 Jun 06, at 10:51 PM 13 Jun 06, Jeremy Whitlock wrote:
Hi all,
This is an email that Jason sent me to give you a better
understanding
of the previous email I sent. Please feel free to comment,
question or add
suggestions to the effort.
Take
It is an optimisation to ensure you don't need to look at all of the
plugins first. Possibly a better alternative is to resolve plugins in
two phases (get all the plugins up front, figure this stuff out, get
dependencies of the plugins later when the code is actually executed). I
think that is
Oh, please don't tell me that EJB3 still requires that you bake
configuration into the deployed artifact. :(
I generally would use a JNDI based lookup for the connection that would
always be the same inside the code/configuration, and then you just need
to configure your server depending on
Isn't a better workaround just to use the resources mechanism until
something more flexible is in place?
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Any comments on this issue or patch? Is it possible to have it applied?
Thanks
--
Jeremy
Jeremy Boynes (JIRA) wrote:
Add LICENCE and NOTICE files to the jar
I'm going to start a separate thread on documentation.
- Brett
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The plugin documentation is improving, but there's a wealth of
information being posted to the user list that gets lost in the
archives. In my opinion, you're missing out on some great
contributions by not
Running Maven 2.0.4 release, and am trying to build the latest
cobertura-maven-plugin from SVN. The compiler throws a symbol not found
for the getDefaultExcludesAsList() method in the FileUtils class.
This is regardless of the fact that plexus-utils-1.1.jar is present in my
classpath, as well as
I don't really like when a map is used for a list of objects with two
properties. Couldn't we have a little object for this?
- Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: epunzalan
Date: Mon Jun 12 23:53:38 2006
New Revision: 413818
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=413818view=rev
Log:
Added
This question is appropriate for users@maven.apache.org
/me shakes fist at Nabble for not making clear the intent of the list.
- Brett
henrikwl wrote:
Running Maven 2.0.4 release, and am trying to build the latest
cobertura-maven-plugin from SVN. The compiler throws a symbol not found
for the
I was thinking about that... but thought that it was too little. But
since you brought it up, I'll change it. Thanks.
^_^
Brett Porter wrote:
I don't really like when a map is used for a list of objects with two
properties. Couldn't we have a little object for this?
- Brett
[EMAIL
Hi,
I am having issues running both branch and trunk versions simultaneously.
In particular, when I use 2.0.4, some jars from 2.1-SNAPSHOT get
picked up and I end up with incompatible classes in the CP.
I can try to use separate local repositories (using 2 settings.xml
pointing to 2 different
I've only ever needed to set a different M2_HOME
jerome lacoste wrote:
Hi,
I am having issues running both branch and trunk versions simultaneously.
In particular, when I use 2.0.4, some jars from 2.1-SNAPSHOT get
picked up and I end up with incompatible classes in the CP.
I can try to use
done
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The assembly plugin was released in mid-May, and most of the website
is updated, but not the descriptor:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html
That page is still dated last October, and doesn't show the new
moduleSets element.
Thanks,
Hi
In one of my Mojos I am running an Ant skript which execute a java task that
forks a new jvm. I have run into a situation where if the commandline exceeds
1010 characters it fails. I have seen that this was also a problem with the
javadoc task, but was circumvented with the addition of the
On 6/13/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've only ever needed to set a different M2_HOME
That didn't work...
I had to remove the plugin which was causing an issue.
rm -r ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-plugin-plugin/
Maybe I had installed this plugin incorrectly?
Apologies - I will repost in users@ then.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/plexus-utils-1.1-giving-me-a-hard-time-t1778469.html#a4841993
Sent from the Maven - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe,
Shouldn't happen, all the libraries need to be backwards compatible.
You may have found an issue that needs to be fixed.
On 6/13/06, jerome lacoste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/13/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've only ever needed to set a different M2_HOME
That didn't work...
Hi,
with Maven 1 the JavaDoc plugin created not only the JavaDoc but also a
report with the Warnings that came up during JavaDoc generation.
This is no longer the case with the Maven 2 JavaDoc plugin? Or did I miss
some option somewhere?
thanks,
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
i.A. Detlef Pleiß
Title: Complex distributed multi project depnedencies with Maven 2
Hi,
I think that I may have posed a problem to user group that no one could answer due to its more complex nature.
I was wondering if anyone developing Maven had the solution and could provide me with the answer.
Rgds
OK, maven-plugins works for me when I upgrade to jxr plugin 1.5. But my
other project 'jetstyle' still fails with the same message. But that's
not important.
At least now we know that there is a work-around available - fix your
local class path by upgrading plugins. Hopefully these will all
I'll try to push the issue of getting rid of the jsl file over at
Jakarta Commons.
--
Dennis Lundberg
Dion Gillard wrote:
We got rid of using the custom jsl and are moving to the way that commons
email etc do it.
On 6/13/06, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a component
Check the plugins that use plexus-utils at [1] and try to upgrade at
least those (again: careful with the artifact plugin).
Cheers,
-Lukas
[1]
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/bundled/dependency-convergence-report.html
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
OK, maven-plugins works for me when I
Lukas Theussl wrote:
If the Downloads link problem above and another problem I found (will
send another mail about that) can be solved, I'm +1. The rest seems to
be Commons specific, which shouldn't hold back the release of the xdoc
plugin.
I deployed another snapshot, please test.
Oops, my mistake. Snapshot is redeployed, please try again. :)
-Lukas
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Lukas Theussl wrote:
If the Downloads link problem above and another problem I found (will
send another mail about that) can be solved, I'm +1. The rest seems
to be Commons specific, which
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote to release the maven eclipse plugin 1.11 [1]
and the war plugin 1.6.2 [2] (second try!):
The staging sites are available at:
* eclipse:
http://people.apache.org/~snicoll/maven-stage-site/maven-1.x/plugins/eclipse/
* war:
It looks good now!
--
Dennis Lundberg
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Oops, my mistake. Snapshot is redeployed, please try again. :)
-Lukas
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Lukas Theussl wrote:
If the Downloads link problem above and another problem I found
(will send another mail about that) can be
+1 for both
Arnaud
On 6/13/06, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote to release the maven eclipse plugin 1.11 [1]
and the war plugin 1.6.2 [2] (second try!):
The staging sites are available at:
* eclipse:
+1
Arnaud
On 6/13/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks good now!
--
Dennis Lundberg
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Oops, my mistake. Snapshot is redeployed, please try again. :)
-Lukas
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Lukas Theussl wrote:
If the Downloads link problem above and
The vote passed.
I'll release them ASAP.
Arnaud
On 6/6/06, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
s/
On 6/6/06, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another ping to our fellow pmc's.
Please!
-Lukas
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
I need another vote to release these plugins.
+1 x2
I suppose that MPWAR-40 and MPWAR-44 can be closed as won't fix now?
-Lukas
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote to release the maven eclipse plugin 1.11 [1]
and the war plugin 1.6.2 [2] (second try!):
The staging sites are available at:
* eclipse:
We had a bit of noise on this thread so I hope I quote the result
accurately, please correct me if something's wrong.
There are 3 binding +1's (Stephane, Arnaud, Lukas) and two people (Jeff
Jensen and Dennis Lundberg) who expressed positive opinions, but without
casting an explicit vote.
Hi,
I just finished some stuff in the dist plugin and I'd like to release it
for inclusion in maven-1.1-beta-3.
For changes please check the jira and changes reports on the
stage site given below.
+1, 72h...
Cheers,
Lukas
I don't have a vote! :-) But it would be +1. Thanks Lukas...
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 6:13 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: Maven Project Management Committee List
Subject: [Result] [vote] [m1] release
+1 on noticing the dtd entry alone. (non binding )
On 6/13/06, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a vote! :-) But it would be +1. Thanks Lukas...
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 6:13 PM
To: Maven
Hi,
We are having a discussion on how to version Yoko's first milestone release.
Can somebody clarify and confirm on how maven deals with version tag.
The question is, will 1.0 version tag be considered as greater/latest
compared to 1.0-incubating-M1?
i.e
x.y.z-alphabetic x.y.z x.y.z-numeric
It looks good now!
--
Dennis Lundberg
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Oops, my mistake. Snapshot is redeployed, please try again. :)
-Lukas
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Lukas Theussl wrote:
If the Downloads link problem above and another problem I found
(will send another mail about that) can be
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
Hi,
Yes. I've just tested this with some new unit testsnew unit tests in
maven-artifact's DefaultArtifactVersion.
The testcase reports that 2.0.1-xyz 2.0.1 2.0.1-123.
-- Kenney
Hi,
We are having a discussion on how to version Yoko's first
doesn't it take into account the maven-metadata.xml ?
On 6/14/06, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
Hi,
Yes. I've just tested this with some new unit testsnew unit tests in
maven-artifact's DefaultArtifactVersion.
The testcase reports
Everybody has a vote, - yours is just non-binding. :)
-Lukas
Jeff Jensen wrote:
I don't have a vote! :-) But it would be +1. Thanks Lukas...
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 6:13 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc:
That reminds me: I have to get the dtd to the location specified in the
docs (http://www.apache.org/dtds/xdoc_1_0.dtd), what's the procedure for
getting this done?
-Lukas
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
+1 on noticing the dtd entry alone. (non binding )
On 6/13/06, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Dennis,
Looking back, I saw this mail from you and a number of patches in JIRA.
Are you able to look at applying these yourself now?
Thanks!
- Brett
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
The How To Help page at
41 matches
Mail list logo
