You can commit them.
Emmanuel
Fabrice Bellingard a écrit :
Hi guys,
I started looking at Archiva (on trunk) a few days ago: this looks really
promising, great job! :-)
As I tested it, I started fixing some bugs and coding some stuffs. I've
already put some code in JIRA (MRM-334 and MRM-341).
Yep, I already updated the logs..
Brett Porter wrote:
Did you update this particular commit with svn pe --revprop -r535724
svn:log ?
On 09/05/2007, at 7:40 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Ok, I'll take note of that
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: oching
Date: Sun May
Hi,
Unfortunately removing the exclusion clause didn't help ;/
is there anything wrong with my pom file? I can't find a problem there but
maybe I'm missing something.
Best regards,
Severin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Wayne Fay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I've notice that when using maven-idea-plugin, the module name that is
generated is based solely on artifact id.
Is there a particular reason for this? Why wouldn't it use project name
instead?
The reason I'm asking this is that we have three maven
I always prefix my artifactId(s) with a common prefix - for that reason; e.g.
myproject-core, myproject-commons, myproject-webapp,
myproject-webapp-jsf, myproject-webapp-struts, and so on. It lengthens
the names, but makes everything clear (and I don't need to use the
'finalName' property too...)
+1
-Deng
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Archiva 0.9-alpha-2 was tagged and built this afternoon. For extra
credit, the entire build was done with an Archiva 0.9 snapshot running
locally, configured as mirrorOf=* and proxying all necessary remote
repositories. I also tested this configuration with the
Ecker Severin wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately removing the exclusion clause didn't help ;/
is there anything wrong with my pom file? I can't find a problem there but
maybe I'm missing something.
Can't see anything obviously wrong. You might try running mvn with -X
which will give you lots of
+1
Emmanuel
Wendy Smoak a écrit :
Archiva 0.9-alpha-2 was tagged and built this afternoon. For extra
credit, the entire build was done with an Archiva 0.9 snapshot running
locally, configured as mirrorOf=* and proxying all necessary remote
repositories. I also tested this configuration with
Hi,
i have developed the Maven Dashboard plugin ( hosted by Codehaus).
And i have many discussions with Garvin LeClaire about the Dashboard Quality
application
as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-732
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-732 and here
You can have an external profile.xml file which contains all the profiles
you need. Rather than dynamically generate the POM, you can generate the
profiles.xml file easily enough.
Eric
On 5/14/07, Evan Worley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply Deng,
The thing is, we don't know
That is a good suggestion Eric, I may give that a try.
Thanks much,
Evan
On 5/15/07, Eric Redmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can have an external profile.xml file which contains all the profiles
you need. Rather than dynamically generate the POM, you can generate the
profiles.xml file
Well, it's May, and nothing happened, so I'd like to ask one more time
for someone to apply MNG-2854. This is the issue, that should fix that
jar files are recreated always, which can make Maven real slow in
larger projects.
Jochen
--
My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting
neither of those are specifically on the roadmap for development, but
having said that if you were you take a look and implement them we
would be more then happy to factor them into continuum :)
the thing to do to start would be to probably log them as issues in
jira, maybe kick out some
Le jeudi 26 avril 2007, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
Nice, thanks.
I'm doing some Ant (well, a conversion) so I'll take a look as soon
as I can.
Thanks,
Jason.
Any news on Maven Ant Tasks?
What can I do to help release 2.0.6?
Hervé
Hi Arik,
Yes, I have been using the prefix for alittle while but found that it is a
silly way to get around the problem given that maven coordinate system is
groupId:artifactId:version (http://maven.apache.org/pom.html)
artifactId does not need to be unique and it is contextual to groupId. It
On 15 May 07, at 12:54 PM 15 May 07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Well, it's May, and nothing happened, so I'd like to ask one more time
for someone to apply MNG-2854. This is the issue, that should fix that
jar files are recreated always, which can make Maven real slow in
larger projects.
It's
Hi,
Repost of the vote after fixing the issues with the uber JAR that was
produced. Hervé and I have tried them and they appear to work fine.
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
The uber jar that people will want to
On 5/16/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not simply a matter of applying the patch. If you are willing to
apply, run the integration tests against 2.0.x and 2.1.x and they
work then I will integrate it.
If you're willing to do this I will write up instructions (extract
them from
+1
--jason
On May 15, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Repost of the vote after fixing the issues with the uber JAR that
was produced. Hervé and I have tried them and they appear to work
fine.
The staging repository is here:
19 matches
Mail list logo
