Don't we have to vote. I'm not specially for this, because we are working on
alpha, but what about apache rules ??
Arnaud
On 23/06/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/20/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I won't have time to test until Friday, but if everything seems to be
On 6/23/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't we have to vote. I'm not specially for this, because we are working on
alpha, but what about apache rules ??
Absolutely! I'll stage it on people.a.o and we'll vote on the actual
proposed distributions. It's not a release until it
On 6/22/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simply add it to the finalName (you get a weird -src-src artifact in
target, but it's correct in the repository and when unpacked - see
the maven root pom).
It's correct when unpacked, and -src-src in target. The name in the
repository is
On 6/23/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's correct when unpacked, and -src-src in target.
Adding this got rid of the double -src-src in the filename:
appendAssemblyIdfalse/appendAssemblyId
It's still artifactId-version in the repository, but that's as
expected. We'd have to
ok, sorry for the question. I didn't remember.
Arnaud
On 23/06/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/23/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't we have to vote. I'm not specially for this, because we are
working on
alpha, but what about apache rules ??
Absolutely! I'll
On 6/23/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, sorry for the question. I didn't remember.
No apology necessary... I wasn't very clear about my plans. :)
It's staged here if anyone wants a preview:
http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/archiva/1.0-alpha-2/
I'll call a vote after I
Exclusions ?
dependency
groupIdorg.codehaus.plexus/groupId
artifactIdplexus-archiver/artifactId
version1.0-alpha-9-SNAPSHOT/version
exclusions
exclusion
groupIdorg.codehaus.plexus/groupId
artifactIdplexus-container-default/artifactId
/exclusion
exclusion
Le samedi 23 juin 2007, Brett Porter a écrit :
We shouldn't permit relative entities in the POM - it would cause
grief when deployed to the repository.
- Brett
ok, then the target API is read(InputStream)
I won't add read(URL).
regards,
Hervé
On 23/06/2007, at 5:29 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le samedi 23 juin 2007, Brett Porter a écrit :
We shouldn't permit relative entities in the POM - it would cause
grief when deployed to the repository.
- Brett
ok, then the target API is read(InputStream)
I won't add read(URL).
I think read(URL) is actually the only
Done. Just wait for it to sync.
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Can we stage this on please?
Stéphane
On 6/13/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Jun 07, at 2:10 PM 12 Jun 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Here are the results of this vote:
+1: Dennis Lundberg, Stephane Nicoll, Jason van
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 9 Jun 07, at 5:56 AM 9 Jun 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Sure. I think I've found out why the process stopped after the files
had been unzipped on the server. It turns out that we are using
OS-dependent file separators in the rename script. Here's what that
script looks
All sounds good. Shall we prepare a release? I can write up some doco
but it's probably good to get a quick alpha release out.
On 23 Jun 07, at 8:36 AM 23 Jun 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 9 Jun 07, at 5:56 AM 9 Jun 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Sure. I think I've found
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
There is the Popular Issues in JIRA which shows the votes overall for
a project:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:popularissues-panel
Is there an easy way in JIRA to see this for a specific version like
2.0.x ?
Hi,
can anybody confirm/deny that the changes to mvn.bat in r543625 have
broken result codes ?
Errors are no longer reported in 2.0.7.
If I restore the @endLocal, it works as it did before.
:error
+if %OS%==Windows_NT @endlocal
set ERROR_CODE=1
Tom
We need to decide what to do about the wagon dependency before we can
release it. Currently the plugin depends on wagon 1.0-rc1-SNAPSHOT. I
don't follow wagon development so I don't know how far off an rc1
release is.
It would be nice if the repositoryId parameter could pick up the
username
Nope, that's fine. I'd like the issue set for the sprint to be final
by next Friday so that's cool.
On 23 Jun 07, at 11:05 AM 23 Jun 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
There is the Popular Issues in JIRA which shows the votes
overall for a project:
On 6/20/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was the failure, I just built the release and the tag should
work fine.
Most possibly a problem in my repository: I started with a clean
repository and now it works.
Sorry,
Jochen
--
Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of
Hi,
may I ask that anyone volunteers as an assignee for WAGON-82? This is
the nasty bug that prevents webdav via proxy, a problem which other
Mojo developers surely share with me. I've been adding a patch, but
received no response so far,
Thanks,
Jochen
--
Besides, manipulating elections is
On 22/06/2007, at 8:15 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 22/06/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's never been an alternative, but it was implemented as newest
wins in an early alpha.
Curse the person who switched to nearest! ;)
Sorry :(
At the time, the repository data (mostly
19 matches
Mail list logo
