Hi,
I never yet seen such thing.
But i would be very interested in the answer.
My guess is that you should deploy your
instrumented plugin in a test repository.
Regards
Raphaël
2007/12/7, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I recently added a bunch of integration tests for Surefire. These
>
finally, I have to vote -1
I found that a bug was added when fixing MANTTASKS-91 that cause dependencies
order being wrong when read from a pom.xml file.
I have a test-case and fix. I'll commit them in the week and call for a new
vote
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 04 décembre 2007, Hervé BOUTEMY a
The details about which version I grabbed (and a link to that original
rev) are here:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-shade-plugin.html
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mauro Talevi
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 5:32 AM
To: dev@maven.apa
Brian E. Fox wrote:
We had to revert back to the codehaus version to do 2.0.8 because
something in the apache version was definitely hosed.
Brian, did you make a note of what rev of mojo src you took to start the
repackaging and move?
It would seem that shade-maven-plugin-1.0-alpha-12 was c
