Re: New Profile Activator

2008-01-23 Thread John Casey
I think it's a great idea. Unfortunately, in 2.0.x this requires a change to the xml parser for the pom.xml (in trunk - 2.1-snapshot - it's available via the activator)...at least, I think it would. -john On Jan 23, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, due to the experiences

Re: Breaking changes on Doxia trunk ok?

2008-01-23 Thread Vincent Siveton
2008/1/23, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here's my view on doxia right now. I understand Vincent M's need for > somewhere to commit his stuff to, so let's try to solve that as quickly > as possible. In order to do that I propose yet another alternative > > D) Create an xwiki-branch from th

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-plugin 2.0

2008-01-23 Thread Vincent Siveton
big +1 for this release. For the record, missing LICENSE and NOTICE in *-sources.jar Vincent 2008/1/22, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It's been a long time since the last release and we have lots of > improvements/fixes: > > > > Release Notes - Maven 2.x Dependency Plugin - Version 2.0 > >

New Profile Activator

2008-01-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, due to the experiences with the maven-release-plugin that my colleagues and I made, we are performing releases manually. Our POMs have a release profile that currently needs to be activated via the activator. However being humans, people tend to forget to activate this profile when invoking

Re: Some continuum-jpa branch updates

2008-01-23 Thread Rahul Thakur
A Query object that wraps up criteria and is built programmatically affords us the ability to keep Store APIs lean and stable. That is the motivation behind building up queries programatically. IMHO, the current ContinuumStore is a bunch of methods that don't even vary that much underneath. I

Re: Continuum update

2008-01-23 Thread Rahul Thakur
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I'll probably create a new branch for 1.x dev and will reserve the trunk for 2.x dev. I think I'll do it this week or the next (if you're agree, of course :) ) +1. I'll try to send at the same time my ideas for 2.x so we'll can discuss about them. +1. I

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-plugin 2.0

2008-01-23 Thread Rahul Thakur
+1 Rahul Brian E. Fox wrote: It's been a long time since the last release and we have lots of improvements/fixes: Release Notes - Maven 2.x Dependency Plugin - Version 2.0 ** Bug * [MDEP-59] - dependency:unpack can't extract rar archives * [MDEP-74] - dependencies in test sco

Re: Can somebody check the permissions on repo1.maven.org? (groupId asm)

2008-01-23 Thread Eugene Kuleshov
Carlos, why objectweb repo is listed two times in your rsync list? Xavier, do you know what could be with permissions? I've used regular deployment over webdav and then flushed shadow copy to the prod site using OW Forge admin UI. regards, Eugene Carlos Sanchez wrote: fixed in central

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2008-01-23 Thread Michael McCallum
so you are saying that A-2.0-SNAPSHOT uses B [1,2-!) and someone deploys B 1.4.1-SNAPSHOT and that overrides B 2.0-SNAPSHOT and B 1.4 or just that it overrides B1.4? Depends on your use case... as to how you would deal with that. And one of the reasons why I don't want mng-3092 because I can CI

Re: Breaking changes on Doxia trunk ok?

2008-01-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Here's my view on doxia right now. I understand Vincent M's need for somewhere to commit his stuff to, so let's try to solve that as quickly as possible. In order to do that I propose yet another alternative D) Create an xwiki-branch from the current trunk, where Vincent can add him xwiki impl

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2008-01-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
But that will bugger you up... You are working on the version 2 branch, there is no 2.0 released, only 2.0-SNAPSHOT... you don't care as it is still new and you are happy to use the last stable release, 1.4... Now there is some work that is needed for the 1.4 service pack, so 1.4.1-SNAPSHOT arriv

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2008-01-23 Thread Michael McCallum
BTW if you want to _not_ include a snapshot on an open upper bound you can.. [1,2-!) which will not include 1.0-SNAPSHOT, 1-SNAPSHOT will include any version between 1 and 2 including any 1.2-SNAPSHOT or 1.4-SNAPSHOT will not include 2.0-SNAPSHOT or 2-SNAPSHOT On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:42:13 Mark

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2008-01-23 Thread Michael McCallum
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:42:13 Mark Hobson wrote: > Hi Michael, > There is another caveat in that it's all or nothing. Using a profile > mechanism will switch all range dependencies into snapshot mode, when > typically a developer only wishes to upgrade a couple. How could this > be achieved using

Re: Can somebody check the permissions on repo1.maven.org? (groupId asm)

2008-01-23 Thread Carlos Sanchez
one is for the group asm and another for org.objectweb On Jan 23, 2008 9:28 AM, Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Carlos, why objectweb repo is listed two times in your rsync list? > > Xavier, do you know what could be with permissions? I've used regular > deployment over webdav a

Re: Can somebody check the permissions on repo1.maven.org? (groupId asm)

2008-01-23 Thread Carlos Sanchez
fixed in central the address to notify of such things is [EMAIL PROTECTED] or open an issue in jira MEV And you have the emails of the maintainers in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/tools/trunk/maven-meeper/src/bin/synchronize/m2-sync/sync.csv On Jan 23, 2008 6:54 AM, Daniel Kulp

Re: Can somebody check the permissions on repo1.maven.org? (groupId asm)

2008-01-23 Thread Daniel Kulp
and then tell the ASM folks how to do it properly to avoid it in the future. We had the same problem when 3.0 was added. All the perms were messed up and it took several days to get it and all the mirrors straightened out. Dan On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Stephen Connolly wrote:

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2008-01-23 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi Michael, On 23/01/2008, Michael McCallum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Firstly IMHO of MNG-3092 is that is it not the right thing for maven in > general. > > I believe with MNG-2994 and appropriate use of profiles to enable and disable > snapshot repositories you can have everything that you wan

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-plugin 2.0

2008-01-23 Thread Mark Hobson
BTW, just noticed that there's a lot of references to 2.0-alpha-5 and 2.0-alpha-6 in the mojo @since tags. It'd be worth correcting these to 2.0 to avoid confusing users when we publish the site. Cheers, Mark On 23/01/2008, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, works for me. Long live t

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-plugin 2.0

2008-01-23 Thread Mark Hobson
+1, works for me. Long live the tree! Cheers for the work on this Brian. Mark On 23/01/2008, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > -Lukas > > > Brian E. Fox wrote: > > It's been a long time since the last release and we have lots of > > improvements/fixes: > > > > > > > > Release No

Can somebody check the permissions on repo1.maven.org? (groupId asm)

2008-01-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
rsync: opendir "/asm/asm/3.1" (in maven2) failed: Permission denied (13) rsync: opendir "/asm/asm-analysis/3.1" (in maven2) failed: Permission denied (13) rsync: opendir "/asm/asm-commons/3.1" (in maven2) failed: Permission denied (13) rsync: opendir "/asm/asm-tree/3.1" (in maven2) failed: Permissi

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-plugin 2.0

2008-01-23 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 -Lukas Brian E. Fox wrote: It's been a long time since the last release and we have lots of improvements/fixes: Release Notes - Maven 2.x Dependency Plugin - Version 2.0 ** Bug * [MDEP-59] - dependency:unpack can't extract rar archives * [MDEP-74] - dependencies in test

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-plugin 2.0

2008-01-23 Thread Marat Radchenko
+1 2008/1/23, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 (dependency:tree is a very nice/helpful feature !) > > Thanks, > -- > Olivier > > 2008/1/22, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It's been a long time since the last release and we have lots of > > improvements/fixes: > > > > > > > > Release No

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-plugin 2.0

2008-01-23 Thread Stephane Nicoll
AH, finally :) +1 On Jan 22, 2008 11:10 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's been a long time since the last release and we have lots of > improvements/fixes: > > > > Release Notes - Maven 2.x Dependency Plugin - Version 2.0 > > > > ** Bug > > * [MDEP-59] - dependency:unpac