Hi,
The release button of the project group page only works if all projects
in the group have the same parent and the parent is in the group.
Why doesn't it make a release of all projects in the group ? I think
that it should work as the build all projects button.
Benoit.
This test seems to work fine in my side. May it be that the 2.0.9 used
is not properly built? should I force a build in maven-core?
On Thu, Mar 1, 0008 at 10:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Online report :
+1
Le dimanche 2 mars 2008, Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=
Htmlversion=13994
The remaining issues in JIRA are
+1 for the artifact
But -0 for the documentation. Any reasons why the layout is not standard?
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/3/1, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
I fixed the test in r630474 (a conflict with wrong manifest in Surefire 2.4,
caused by maven-shade-plugin, which is fixed for the release currently being
voted on).
Now, I don't understand the comment in code:
MavenITmng1412DependenciesOrderTest.class ); -- MNG-1412 -- this is a
poorly
+1
Fabrice
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=Htmlversion=13994
Open Call for Papers for ApacheCon US 2008
!REMINDER: this will be a short CFP, ending on 3 April, so please be
sure to get your CFP submissions in soon!
The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) invites submissions to its official
users' conference, ApacheCon US 2008, held 3 November through
Is this the home of the code that is currently being voted on?
If so then it shouldn't be removed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mkleint
Date: Sat Mar 1 05:07:10 2008
New Revision: 632588
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=632588view=rev
Log:
delete maven-toolchain from shared
Removed:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the home of the code that is currently being voted on?
If so then it shouldn't be removed.
Here's the tag that goes with the vote thread:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tags/maven-toolchain-1.0/
I
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the home of the code that is currently being voted on?
If so then it shouldn't be removed.
Here's the tag that goes with the vote thread:
Something is wrong with the environment - if you scroll to the start
it is trying to use Maven 2.0.7 to run the tests. I'll take a look.
- Brett
On 02/03/2008, at 7:05 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
This test seems to work fine in my side. May it be that the 2.0.9 used
is not properly built?
Sorry, I should have removed the comment yesterday - I re-enabled the
test since you'd earlier fixed it. Done now.
- Brett
On 02/03/2008, at 10:56 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I fixed the test in r630474 (a conflict with wrong manifest in
Surefire 2.4,
caused by maven-shade-plugin, which is
I'm helping out in Commons.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
I've been monitoring the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for a while and have
recently gotten more involved trying to make sure ASF releases are
correct both from a Maven perspective and from an ASF policy one, with
pgp signatures, etc. (Thanks to Carlos
I've been monitoring the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for a while and have
recently gotten more involved trying to make sure ASF releases are
correct both from a Maven perspective and from an ASF policy one, with
pgp signatures, etc. (Thanks to Carlos for doing the lion's share of
the repository work--
Brian and Vincent, are you advocating removing just the one line that
added @aggregator, or the entire change related to MJAVADOC-104?
Carlos, any thoughts on this?
--
Wendy
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I say pull the aggregation out (MJAVADOC-104)
The problem is @aggregator, but the quickest and safest is to revert the
whole change since it likely expects @aggregator.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 5:11 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r518309 -
Any reason why revision 614706 from John Casey with Restriction.java
hashCode and equals should not be merged in the 2.0.x branch ?
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
17 matches
Mail list logo