sorry for late review, but it looks generally ok to me.
Milos
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:41 PM, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
As I think I promised last week, I've written up some documentation
for the plugin- and extension-loading refactor I did in trunk last
fall.
I am very sorry,
I need help urgently I have problem with using tomcat 6.0.14 with maven2
+ cargo.
Can u help or give suggestions
Thanks Regards,
Sridhar Thota,
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise private information.
There is one feature in this patch I don't like: you hardcoded a default
encoding to ISO-8859-1 instead of no default value (which means platform
encoding).
Indeed, I also suggested using a fixed default value for other plugins:
- MCOMPILER-63
- MJAVADOC-165
- MRESOURCES-57
I simply chose
Daniel,
Could you also send an email to announce@ and users@ like described in [1]?
Same for maven-shade-plugin and maven-remote-resources
Thanks,
Vincent
[1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
2008/3/20, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This vote passes:
+1
I've encountered this in the IDE integration for netbeans when I want
to allow users to set encoding for the project. Currently I'm setting
configuration for compiler-plugin and resources-plugin but that's
cumbersome.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Dependency Management is now on 2 lines in the nav bar. Is it the
wanted behaviour?
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/3/23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: dennisl
Date: Sun Mar 23 05:38:42 2008
New Revision: 640193
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=640193view=rev
Log:
Hi Brian,
IMHO calling this branch maven-reporting-impl-2.0.4.x sounds better. WDYT?
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/3/24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: brianf
Date: Mon Mar 24 11:44:36 2008
New Revision: 640515
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=640515view=rev
Log:
What about just unifying the expressions that refer to encoding in
plugins?
As an intermediate solution until Maven 2.1 provides an extended POM, this
seems like a good approach.
javadoc-plugin has ${encoding}
compiler-plugin has ${maven.compiler.encoding}
resources-plugin has no expression
Hi
Maven2 and cargo supports tomcat 6?
Can anyone help script for start/stop the tomcat 6 server
Thanks Regards,
Sridhar Thota
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received
Thanks for this Dennis.
Vincent
2008/3/22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: dennisl
Date: Sat Mar 22 15:22:05 2008
New Revision: 640098
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=640098view=rev
Log:
o Add a minimal site.
Added:
Hi Brian,
I guess it would be better to fix parent pom and provide a new release.
It will avoid to duplicate entry poms (see this revision or also r638164)
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/3/21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: brianf
Date: Fri Mar 21 14:34:16 2008
New Revision: 639861
Hi,
I am happy to work on this. I propose to rename IT resources like the following:
mng-3341-metadataUpdatedFromDeploymentRepository - mng-3341
And adding a README or a pom description inside the dir.
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/3/11, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yeah, I noticed this on some
Please stop using the developer list for user questions. People answer
when they can, as they can and that's done on the user mailing lists
which you can find here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 26-Mar-08, at 2:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am very sorry,
I need help
I started to do that and then realized that plugin-plugin doesn't
inherit from the plugin-tools parent, but the plugins parent instead.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:04 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn
Hi,
We are officially moving from Resin to Jetty for production over at
Contegix so we'll be down for a couple hours while they switch over.
Hudson will be back up in a bit, we are just working with Greg/Jan/
Contegix to sort out any issues with Jetty so it won't take long.
Thanks,
Jason
Sorry, I meant Hudson. I don't think Hudons is a word.
On 26-Mar-08, at 10:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
We are officially moving from Resin to Jetty for production over at
Contegix so we'll be down for a couple hours while they switch over.
Hudson will be back up in a bit, we are just
I am using shade to build a single jar out of 3 jars in a multi-module
project. I have it building the Uber-jar of class file but I can't
figure out how to have it also build the Uber-jar of source. How can I
get it to build the uber-source-jar
Doesn't support it currently.
On 26-Mar-08, at 12:24 PM, WALTERS, CRAIG P [AG/1000] wrote:
I am using shade to build a single jar out of 3 jars in a multi-module
project. I have it building the Uber-jar of class file but I can't
figure out how to have it also build the Uber-jar of source. How
We fixed the regressions identified last week with the plugin tools and
reporting impl. The new 2.0.9 is staged at
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/apa
che-maven/2.0.9-RC3/
You'll notice that this one has an RC qualifier attached to it. Since
what I've
Is there an alternative?
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:31 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Building source jar using shade plugin
Doesn't support it currently.
On 26-Mar-08, at 12:24 PM, WALTERS, CRAIG P
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Doesn't support it currently.
Yes it does.
Add to your configuration:
createSourcesJartrue/createSourcesJar
Dan
On 26-Mar-08, at 12:24 PM, WALTERS, CRAIG P [AG/1000] wrote:
I am using shade to build a single jar out of 3 jars in a
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Doesn't support it currently.
Yes it does.
Add to your configuration:
createSourcesJartrue/createSourcesJar
One thing I should add though is if the sources jars aren't available, it
currently
That worked great. Thanks Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 3:02 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Cc: Jason van Zyl
Subject: Re: Building source jar using shade plugin
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Doesn't
+1 for the new process.
not yet tested the bundle.
Raphaël
2008/3/26, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We fixed the regressions identified last week with the plugin tools and
reporting impl. The new 2.0.9 is staged at
I don't think the names are the problem - it's the repositories within
the tests that are.
I was going to try removing them and creating the artifacts in the
repository as part of the unit test.
- Brett
On 26/03/2008, at 11:54 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
I am happy to work on this.
+1 the bundle worked fine to build
the archetype plugin.
Raphaël
2008/3/26, Raphaël Piéroni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1 for the new process.
not yet tested the bundle.
Raphaël
2008/3/26, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We fixed the regressions identified last week with the plugin tools and
I would prefer to keep the names more descriptive than just the number.
When you're working with a bunch, it's hard to remember the exact number
sometimes.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 5:27 PM
To: Maven Developers List
I see it as an unfortunate side effect. I'd much rather have a good
descriptive name, running across 2 lines, than a strained abbreviation
on 1 line.
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Dependency Management is now on 2 lines in the nav bar. Is it the
wanted behaviour?
Cheers,
Vincent
+1 for now. Seems to work with my personal projects at home. I'll see how
well it works on our projects at work and make sure it doesn't break
anything that used to work with 2.0.8.
I'll give my final answer probably in a little over 24 hours from now (want
to make sure it works with all of our
Sejal, thanks...that's exactly the kind of tests we'll need.
-Original Message-
From: Sejal Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:47 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3
+1 for now. Seems to work with my personal projects at
Ill also build all of Atlassians products with the RC3 today and post
some results to the list
James
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 19:55 -0400, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Sejal, thanks...that's exactly the kind of tests we'll need.
-Original Message-
From: Sejal Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks but it won't be as great a test as you might think though since I
long ago locked down the plugin version numbers and stuff in a master parent
pom that is used for all projects in the company. So considering that one of
the good things about this release is the lock down of plugin version I
That's ok, locking the plugin versions is actually something I'm not too
worried about since in all cases we are locking to the currently released
version, and it's a simple fix in the poms if that causes a problem. I'm
worried about stuff like James found (MNG-3119).
-Original
Speaking of which, I just needed to do a release and decided to try doing
the release with maven 2.0.9RC3. Seems like 3119 is not actually fixed
though as I'm running into that problem during the release. I'm attaching
the console output snipped to the 3119 report. To me this would be a
It is, we'll respin RC4 in the morning. IMO, 3119 should be permanently
reverted (in 2.0.x) for the reasons I put in the jira.
-Original Message-
From: Sejal Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:58 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3]
Sejal, James, could you try with this informal RC?
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/2.0.9/ (still uploading, give a few mins)
This should get you past MNG-3119 so we can see if everything else is good
before cutting the RC4 for real. Thanks for testing.
--Brian
-Original Message-
36 matches
Mail list logo
