On 04/07/2008, at 12:43 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I have chopped the issue list down to what I know I'm going to look
at here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10500&fixfor=13143
If you want to
Here's some tips for folks trying to debug Maven/Plexus/Plugins in
Eclipse. Using m2e you can actually debug/execute plugin _inside_
Eclipse. That means the plugin executes from the workspace in-situ.
Extremely handy.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/M2ECLIPSE/Developing+and+debugging+Maven
The test uses the active collections so it's something else (maybe in
conjunction with the active collections).
On 3-Jul-08, at 11:24 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I commented on the JIRA - I'm pretty sure this is a problem with the
active collections.
- Brett
On 04/07/2008, at 1:15 PM, [EMAIL
I commented on the JIRA - I'm pretty sure this is a problem with the
active collections.
- Brett
On 04/07/2008, at 1:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Thu Jul 3 20:15:24 2008
New Revision: 673896
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=673896&view=rev
Log:
Checking MNG-34
I have chopped the issue list down to what I know I'm going to look at
here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10500&fixfor=13143
If you want to add things you know you want to look at, go for it.
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
htt
Oleg,
Do you want to try and do this Sunday/Monday. Even though it's alpha-1
and really only affects 2.1-alpha we should let it bake for the week
and possibly spit out an RC or two. If this goes out Monday and we do
some vetting I can make the proposed schedule of 14 July for 2.1-
alpha-1.
Hi John,
On 01/07/2008, at 11:55 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
In addition to this, and possibly related, I am getting a "Users"
directory in the current directory on my Mac on several occasions,
which I presume was meant to be /Users/brett/ ...
Just FYI since you were looking into this, this ha
Hi folks,
Following recent discussions on dev@ about POM style [1] and Jira
versioning [2], I created several documents about our code style and
conventions, jira and svn conventions.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk/src/site/apt/developers/conventions
It is for discussions and a
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi all,
As I indicated a couple of weeks back, moving towards a 2.1 alpha
release, I was looking at releasing an alpha of maven-artifact. Brian
was able to locate the issue he was referring to a couple of weeks
back about re-resolving (now MARTIFACT-25), so I've postpone
Not to distract from the higher-level discussion, but I'd like to get
into the nuts and bolts of MARTIFACT-25 a bit...in case someone beats me
to it.
We introduced a properties file that tracks resolution attempts for
artifacts that weren't found on the remote repository, and I'd like to
see
Hi all,
As I indicated a couple of weeks back, moving towards a 2.1 alpha
release, I was looking at releasing an alpha of maven-artifact. Brian
was able to locate the issue he was referring to a couple of weeks
back about re-resolving (now MARTIFACT-25), so I've postponed.
Once that's fix
Yes, this thread started as a way to just clean up the formatting of the POM.
Sorting the dependencies alphabetically would be a separate mojo of the
formatting plugin or just an option to this formatting.
Paul Benedict wrote:
Stephen,
That's fine, but I thought the proposal was to reorder th
Stephen,
That's fine, but I thought the proposal was to reorder the dependencies in
the POM? Is there a plan to clean the POM without reordering the
dependencies?
Paul
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:03 AM, Stephen Connolly <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue is that the order of dependencies does
The issue is that the order of dependencies does matter.
Resolving transitive dependencies is based on how near the dependency
is to the pom and the order in which dependencies are listed...
Listing them in alpha order, if you've always done this is fine and
won't change your build (as you've alw
15 matches
Mail list logo
