[result] Release Wagon 1.0 beta 4

2008-07-30 Thread Brett Porter
+1 from Emmanuel, Olivier and myself. I'll proceed with the release. - Brett On 28/07/2008, at 1:51 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi The Wagon 1.0-beta-4 candidate has been staged. This release includes 4 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes here:

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Aaron Digulla
Quoting Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've got some code ready for you to try: http://www.pdark.de/decentxml-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz wrong list? :) I've seen three Maven plugins which use their own code to manipulate POM and other XML files in projects, so I guess this is the right list

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

2008-07-30 Thread Aaron Digulla
Quoting Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, In preparation of the maven-war-plugin, I'd like to release and promote out of the sandbox the maven-filtering component version 1.0-alpha-1. The goal of this component is to provide a common tool for maven plugins to filtering resources. If you're

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Aaron Digulla
Quoting John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've got some code ready for you to try: http://www.pdark.de/decentxml-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz wrong list? :) still, sounds cool. Are you parking this at SF or Codehaus or anywhere like that? :-) Currently, I'm hosting that on my own server; this was a

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 30/07/2008, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote: Quoting Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've got some code ready for you to try: http://www.pdark.de/decentxml-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz wrong list? :) I've seen three Maven plugins which use their own code to manipulate POM and other XML

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

2008-07-30 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Yes, +1 ! - Fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, In preparation of the maven-war-plugin, I'd like to release and promote out of the sandbox the maven-filtering component version 1.0-alpha-1. The goal of this component is to

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

2008-07-30 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, The front page [1] says : This Plexus components has been build with the filtering process/code coming from the maven-resources-plugin. The goal is to provide a common way for all plugins which needs to filtering resources. It's not enough ? (sorry I'm not english native and I can't put more

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30/07/2008, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote: Quoting Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've got some code ready for you to try: http://www.pdark.de/decentxml-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz wrong list? :) I've seen

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30/07/2008, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote: Quoting Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've got some code ready for you to try:

MJAVADOC-116: is won't fix the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Hi all, sorry to disturb you, but I sincerely don't like that MJAVADOC-116 has been closed: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-116 The bug (because it *is* a bug) is still there, and closing it won't hide the problem. Why did you close it? Can you explain the technical difficulties that you

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven DOAP plugin version 1.0

2008-07-30 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Arnaud On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -- Olivier 2008/7/29 Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, We solved 10 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11310styleName=Htmlversion=13182 There are just one

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is won't fix the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Antonio, I understand your arguments but this issue is due to @requiresDependencyResolution tag. It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. BTW we could add a FAQ entry. Any more thoughts? Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/30 Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, sorry to disturb you, but

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

2008-07-30 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Olivier, 2008/7/30 Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, The front page [1] says : This Plexus components has been build with the filtering process/code coming from the maven-resources-plugin. The goal is to provide a common way for all plugins which needs to filtering resources. It's

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is won't fix the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I understand your arguments but this issue is due to @requiresDependencyResolution tag. It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. Thank you Vincent, but then why don't you open a new issue for the core, and let MJAVADOC-116 depend on this one,

timestamp plugins and build reproductibility

2008-07-30 Thread nicolas de loof
Hello, I went into an issue with the release plugin : I'm using SNAPSHOT plugins, and to make my build reproductible I fixed the versions to timestamps. This worked fine until today as I get : java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: createArg at

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is won't fix the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Vincent Siveton
Done Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/30 Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I understand your arguments but this issue is due to @requiresDependencyResolution tag. It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. Thank you Vincent, but then why don't you

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

2008-07-30 Thread Olivier Lamy
Done. Just wait sync. -- Olivier 2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Olivier, 2008/7/30 Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, The front page [1] says : This Plexus components has been build with the filtering process/code coming from the maven-resources-plugin. The goal is to

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is won't fix the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Done Great, thanks a lot :-) So it's MNG-3283 the real problem... Thanks again and sorry for the (unintended) rudeness. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
There are a couple that are decent. XMLBeans does a good job of not completely mutilating the XML, and the code that's been created for m2eclipse using EMF is pretty good as well. Netbeans is still using some JDOM based code that is not bad either. The JDOM code is so-so and is used in a

CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, while having a look at the recent failure during build #181 of maven-shared, I noticed that the modules after the failing one were not build at all (Build failed before it gets to this module). Since the modules of maven-shared are not that tightly coupled, might it be sensible to

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 30-Jul-08, at 6:13 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, while having a look at the recent failure during build #181 of maven- shared, I noticed that the modules after the failing one were not build at all (Build failed before it gets to this module). Since the modules of maven-shared

Re: timestamp plugins and build reproductibility

2008-07-30 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
nicolas de loof wrote: I went into an issue with the release plugin : java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: createArg at org.apache.maven.shared.release.exec.ForkedMavenExecutor.executeGoals(ForkedMavenExecutor.java:79) Just in case you didn't already find out yourself: The problem was that

Re: timestamp plugins and build reproductibility

2008-07-30 Thread nicolas de loof
Yes, I fixed the issue but updating the plugin timestamp to -7. Thanks. Nicolas. 2008/7/30 Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] nicolas de loof wrote: I went into an issue with the release plugin : java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: createArg at

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Is it possible ? I never saw this option in hudson. Is it the option called Build modules in parallel ? I also noticed that we oftened manually defined custom local repos for builds with -Dmaven.repo.local=... Perhaps we could use the Use private maven repository option that was added in 1.223 ?

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
Just use a freestyle project and then you can do whatever you like. On 30-Jul-08, at 6:36 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Is it possible ? I never saw this option in hudson. Is it the option called Build modules in parallel ? I also noticed that we oftened manually defined custom local repos for

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: We have also always one executor frozen for 1 day : maven-ant-plugin-trunkhttps://ci.sonatype.org/job/maven-ant-plugin-trunk/ Seems like the other build processor has also gone mad with maven-2.0.10-RC :( Hudson is totally blocked and has already seven new IT builds

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Aaron Digulla
Jason van Zyl schrieb: It's official: I'm through with the W3C and the stupid XML parsers which came in it's wake. To allow to write XML filters and editors which don't ruin the layout, I've started my own XML parser project DecentXML. There are a couple that are decent. XMLBeans does a good

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Aaron Digulla
Hi, I've finished all the main features and released version 1.0 of DecentXML on Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/decentxml/ Regards, -- Aaron Optimizer Digulla a.k.a. Philmann Dark It's not the universe that's limited, it's our imagination. Follow me and I'll show you something beyond

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC3 - Please Test!

2008-07-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 30/07/2008, at 12:01 PM, John Casey wrote: I think you're misunderstanding me: I was talking about test coverage within _wagon_ itself. Since wagon is on a separate release cycle to Maven core, Maven releases have to consume released versions of wagon. This means 72h of voting and so

RE: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Brian E. Fox
Fixed now, never seen that happen before so I'll keep an eye out. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 3:37 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end? Arnaud HERITIER wrote: We have also

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

2008-07-30 Thread Michael McCallum
there is already http://www.xom.nu/ that is worth considering... its goal is correctness and roundtripability ;-)... its mature and stable... i have used it and been very happy On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:34:53 Stephen Connolly wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Connolly [EMAIL

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC3 - Please Test!

2008-07-30 Thread John Casey
Thanks for the time on all of this. I had made a note locally to take a look at the tests in wagon to see what could be improved once I got 2.0.10 out the door, but you've beaten me to it. I'll hold off on the RC4 I was about to announce, if you're releasing it tomorrow, and we can try

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Brian Fox
No, it's not required to redo it as freestyle just to add fae On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just use a freestyle project and then you can do whatever you like. On 30-Jul-08, at 6:36 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Is it possible ? I never saw this option in

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Brian Fox
Go for it Sent from my iPhone On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:13 AM, Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, while having a look at the recent failure during build #181 of maven- shared, I noticed that the modules after the failing one were not build at all (Build failed before it gets to

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

2008-07-30 Thread Brian Fox
Just add -fae to the goals line. Until I verify the use separate repo works I prefer to use the maven switch directly Sent from my iPhone On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:36 AM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible ? I never saw this option in hudson. Is it the option called