Checksum Format for .md5 and .sha1 Files

2009-01-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, With regard to MINSTALL-47, I would like to discuss if we can/should change the format used for checksum files generated by Maven. Currently, Maven outputs the plain checksum as-is to the checksum file (cf. [1]), e.g. 1dbbdec30feca97198d5d7e96d42dc57 In the mentioned issue, it was

Re: Checksum Format for .md5 and .sha1 Files

2009-01-02 Thread Brian Fox
I'm -1 to making a new format, but ambivalent about changing it to match openssl standards --Brian (mobile) On Jan 2, 2009, at 5:31 AM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Hi, With regard to MINSTALL-47, I would like to discuss if we can/should change the format used

Re: Checksum Format for .md5 and .sha1 Files

2009-01-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brian Fox wrote: I'm -1 to making a new format Just to make sure we all have the same understanding: The proposed format is not new as in yet another checksum format. It's an already existing format used by the md5sum tool (compare the format attribute of Ant's checksum task [0]).

Re: Checksum Format for .md5 and .sha1 Files

2009-01-02 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Not to mention, that there is already a lot of files generated by md5sum and sha1sum apps on central: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/log4j/log4j/maven-metadata.xml.md5 http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/log4j/log4j/maven-metadata.xml.sha1 But in the above cases, the path is obviously misleading. ~t~

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-skins parent POM 4

2009-01-02 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi It time to release our Stylus skin. To start off we need to get a new release of maven-skins parent 4 out, so that we later can release maven-stylus-skin. This is to comply with the new with the new Privacy policy. Diff of the POM since the last release:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release maven-skins parent POM 4

2009-01-02 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Brian E Fox, Oliver Lamy, Arnaud Heritier, Vincent Siveton, Emmanuel Venisse, Herve Boutemy, Dennis Lundberg +1 (non binding): Mauro Talevi, Marten Storm I will move artifacts to central repo. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi It

Re: Checksum Format for .md5 and .sha1 Files

2009-01-02 Thread Oleg Gusakov
I remember that wagon, at least 1.0-beta-4, strips everything after * in the signature file including, so it should already be implemented on the reading side. Wagon team - please correct me if I am wrong - I did not check out the wagon source. So we'll have to add it to the writing side of

Re: Checksum Format for .md5 and .sha1 Files

2009-01-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Oleg Gusakov wrote: I remember that wagon, at least 1.0-beta-4, strips everything after * in the signature file including, so it should already be implemented on the reading side. Wagon team - please correct me if I am wrong - I did not check out the wagon source. The checksum verification

could not use snapshot plugin with 2.0.9

2009-01-02 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Hi guys, It seems I hit a regression in 2.0.9 or a weird behavior. I am unable to use a snapshot plugin with 2.0.9, it constantly uses the release version even when I use the -U flag or I set the snapshot update policy to always. Switching to 2.0.8 works just fine. See also