Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2009-01-04 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
+1 - Fabrice belling...@apache.org On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some > gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't > recommend anyone use this in production. If

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2009-01-04 Thread Shane Isbell
+1 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some > gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't > recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it and give > feedb

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2009-01-04 Thread Oleg Gusakov
+1 Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it and give feedback that's great, but we have a lot of w

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2009-01-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 4-Jan-09, at 11:49 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Jan 4, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: We are trying extremely hard to make everything accessible by producing tons of ITs, a specification for POM construction and builds coming off the grid at a very high frequency. I hope that

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2009-01-04 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jan 4, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: We are trying extremely hard to make everything accessible by producing tons of ITs, a specification for POM construction and builds coming off the grid at a very high frequency. I hope that fairly soon into the alpha cycle we can attract

RE: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2009-01-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...@sonatype.com] Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 7:32 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1 Hi, This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some gracious guinea pigs who are arduously

Re: Model Version: is it really useful?

2009-01-04 Thread Brett Porter
I started using that in the branch from early last year that handled multiple model versions, using StAX, and moved some fields to attributes. You can find it in the maven-2.0.x-terse branch. - Brett On 31/12/2008, at 6:45 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: there is a feature in Modello since novembe

RE: could not use snapshot plugin with 2.0.9

2009-01-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
What plugin? Remember that 2.0.9's superpom provides default pluginManagement values for most org.apache.maven.plugins -Original Message- From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:stephane.nic...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 12:41 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: could not use s

Re: svn commit: r730869 - in /maven/wagon/trunk/wagon-providers/wagon-ssh-common/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/wagon/providers/ssh/knownhost/ test/java/org/apache/maven/wagon/providers/ssh/knownhost

2009-01-04 Thread Brett Porter
This seems to have broken the unit tests... are they working for you? - Brett On 03/01/2009, at 10:35 AM, dant...@apache.org wrote: Author: dantran Date: Fri Jan 2 15:35:51 2009 New Revision: 730869 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730869&view=rev Log: WAGON-254: rewritten known_hosts f

Re: svn commit: r731213 - in /maven/wagon/trunk/wagon-providers: wagon-ftp/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/wagon/providers/ftp/FtpWagon.java wagon-ssh-common/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/wagon/provid

2009-01-04 Thread Brett Porter
Is that consistent with the behaviour of the other providers as well? Can you add tests to ensure it is applied consistently? Thanks, Brett On 04/01/2009, at 8:54 PM, dant...@apache.org wrote: Author: dantran Date: Sun Jan 4 01:54:21 2009 New Revision: 731213 URL: http://svn.apache.org/vie

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2009-01-04 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 :) ~t~ On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some > gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't > recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it and give

[VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2009-01-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it and give feedback that's great, but we have a lot of work we know ourselves

[ANN] Maven Skins parent 4 Released

2009-01-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Skins parent, version 4 Enjoy, -The Maven team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r730922 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-ear-plugin: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ear/ src/site/apt/ src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ear/it/ src/test/resources/ src/te

2009-01-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Stephane Nicoll wrote: > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < > benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote: > >> Stephane Nicoll wrote: >> >> Right. I would like to but idea-codestyle is not available anymore :( Can >>> anyone send it to me please? >>> >> Do you mean the one [0] given at [1

Re: svn commit: r730922 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-ear-plugin: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ear/ src/site/apt/ src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ear/it/ src/test/resources/ src/te

2009-01-04 Thread Stephane Nicoll
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote: > Stephane Nicoll wrote: > > Right. I would like to but idea-codestyle is not available anymore :( Can >> anyone send it to me please? >> > > Do you mean the one [0] given at [1] doesn't work for newer IDEA ver