Hi there,
On Jan 31, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi Jason,
2009/1/29 Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org:
Howdy,
I've been looking at reporting in Maven 3.x and I've been following
the work
that Vincent Massol has been doing over at XWiki where he has made
some
attempts at
So there will be
2.0.x
2.1.x
and 3.0 ?
2009/1/30 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
There's a new 2.1 cut from the 2.0.x branch that provides a space to put
features. We did this back in Aug/Sept but there's been little forward
progress, so a release should get it started. When we
binaries available ?
2009/1/31 Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com:
Shane/Benjamin,
Go ahead and roll your changes into trunk.
The alpha-2 is tagged. No messages about the vote because of a problem with
the upgrade on people.apache.org which is preventing me from deploying.
Thanks,
Jason
Christopher,
Although I can't help you with pde-maven-plugin (I remember some
discussion here about retiring it, see [1]), I am working on another
maven-based tool called Tycho that should be able to build Eclipse RCP
applications. You can read more about Tycho goals and scope in [2] and
RCP
Who knows. Maybe, maybe not depending on the timing and uptake of 3.x
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.go...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:11 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: releasing 2.0.10?
I agree.
But no 2.2.x is planned ?
2009/2/2 Brian
That's the plan.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.go...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 11:09 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: releasing 2.0.10?
2009/2/2 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
Who knows. Maybe, maybe not depending on the timing and
Hi,
I'm trying to use file mappers inside a maven plugin with the
file-management shared project.
I've added a fileset definition in the plugin's configuration as follow :
plugin
groupIdinfo.flex-mojos/groupId
artifactIdflex-compiler-mojo/artifactId
Did that, yeah. Thanks for the hint.
Georgy
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu wrote:
Can you turn of the checksum checking?
-Original Message-
From: Georgy Bolyuba [mailto:boly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:39 AM
To:
please check your firewall setting
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, amrorabi amror...@gmail.com wrote:
Please,
I am a beginner with the Maven apache-maven-2.0.9, and I installed it and
set the environment variables,
then I tried to run just the command mvn clean but on plugins jars are
+3 binding votes, I proceed moving mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4 to production
Thanks,
Oleg
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
This is iterative improvements release of Mercury.
The major change:
- timestamped artifacts can now have dependencies - a bug was fixed
1 issue fixed:
I guess runing mvn clean -e will give mor info. For starters, I
think it is possible that he does not have a pom.xml in
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator folder. I assume he needs to
change the current folder (cd path_to_project_here)
Georgy
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Roshan Gunoo
2009/2/2 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
Who knows. Maybe, maybe not depending on the timing and uptake of 3.x
Well if 2.1.0 is quickly stable and you need to add more stuff, 2.2.0
could be a good idea.
But 2.x.y should stop at some time when 3.0 will be available or users
will be stuck
Any reason not to use a new field in settings.xml? I think 2.1.x can
be capable of updating the model version.
Why introduce a bunch of new work for this? Also, we wanted to make it
work in 2.0.x if possible. Since it's completely optional to use, there
should be little downside risk to
I'm surprised no one has commented.
Since it's an important issue in my work or anyone that packages ears I
would think.
I'll comment below.
1. add a new scope called application that is exposed
as application dependencies
Having a scope for these seems to be a better approach in my
Hi,
I am new here, so, might be missing something. I am trying to build
maven from trunk and:
Missing:
--
1) org.apache.maven.mercury:mercury-event:jar:1.0.0-alpha-4-SNAPSHOT
So, I am kinda confused. Is it or is it not available (mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4)?
Georgy
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at
I agree.
But no 2.2.x is planned ?
2009/2/2 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
Yes, but hopefully 2.0.x is end of life with either 2.0.10 or 2.0.11 and
2.1.x becomes the active line.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.go...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02,
Can you turn of the checksum checking?
-Original Message-
From: Georgy Bolyuba [mailto:boly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:39 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Building from source
Hi,
I am following this:
I ran into a snag deploying the binaries due to a change in one of the
Apache machines. Everything is fine now but that's why I didn't deploy
it.
On 2-Feb-09, at 12:36 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
binaries available ?
2009/1/31 Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com:
Shane/Benjamin,
Go ahead and
Hi,
1. You are correct - it is up to the ear plugin and the war plugin to package
these dependencies correctly.
2. The purpose of having an application dependency would be to remove the
need to specify every dependency within your ear pom and also remove the need
to have an aggregation pom*.
Hi,
I am following this:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-building-m2.html.
Checkout from trunk:
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/trunk .
Trying to build:
ant
Result:
BUILD FAILED
D:\tests\maven\build.xml:82: Unable to resolve artifact:
Hello,
I try to get the artifact name in a home-made plugin. I use the code below
based on the maven-install-plugin.
I am expecting the plugin name to be set after the package phase but it is not
the case.
I probably did not get a concept, could you let me know if something obvious is
missing
Yes, that's expected - artifacts with a particular classifier are
considered different to artifacts with a different or no classifier.
On 02/02/2009, at 5:44 PM, Nick Pellow wrote:
Hi,
The maven-clover2-plugin creates both a classified and a normal jar
artifact for each sub-module it
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Brett Porter wrote:
On 26/01/2009, at 12:17 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
It should be a validation error if we find duplicated entries.
+1 when building a project. Probably not when encountered in the repository
(but changing the first would reduce the impact over time).
Hi, i want to setup my rcp project with a maven build. so first i want
to build succesfully the example from the pde-maven-plugin site.
i started by downloading the following eclipse sdk and delta pack:
- eclipse-3.4.1-delta-pack.zip
- eclipse-RCP-SDK-3.4.1-win32.zip
i read through the
Yes, but hopefully 2.0.x is end of life with either 2.0.10 or 2.0.11 and
2.1.x becomes the active line.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.go...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:36 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: releasing 2.0.10?
So there will be
On 28/01/2009, at 5:48 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
After a long and interesting discussion last August (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Secured+Passwords
) and several meetings with users, I felt it's overdue to do the
actual implementation.
I massaged my old, vintage 2007 code and put
I am having an issue on 2.0.9. Basicallly, I have a custom plugin that has
it's own packaging type and creates a file of it's own extension type. This
only happens if I run a reactor build. If run maven in that project, it works
correctly. For example,
packagingmy-bundle/packaging
will
The mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4 has been deployed to the sync directory. It
will show up in central as soon as sync is run - may be several hours.
Where are you getting 1.0.0-alpha-4-SNAPSHOT? What are you building?
Thanks,
Oleg
Georgy Bolyuba wrote:
Hi,
I am new here, so, might be missing
Thanks for the clarification, Brett.
What can the maven-clover2-plugin do to ensure that only classified
artifacts are resolved if they are available?
On 03/02/2009, at 9:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Yes, that's expected - artifacts with a particular classifier are
considered different to
You can't modify the resolution, but you can filter the artifacts it
gets from the project. There are a few utility classes for that
(you'll see them used in the dependency plugin, assembly plugin for
example).
- Brett
On 03/02/2009, at 12:14 PM, Nick Pellow wrote:
Thanks for the
Georgy Bolyuba wrote:
Hi,
I am new here, so, might be missing something. I am trying to build
maven from trunk and:
I guess, I phrased my question incorrectly: maven trunk depends on
mercury 1.0.0-alpha-2, where did you get that error? Building what?
Thanks,
Oleg
Missing:
--
1)
On 03/02/2009, at 1:24 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Any reason not to use a new field in settings.xml? I think 2.1.x can
be capable of updating the model version.
Why introduce a bunch of new work for this?
I'm just concerned that we make this exception here and suddenly we
have multiple
Will the filtering be applied to the artifacts resolved by the maven-
compiler-plugin, and the maven-surefire-plugin?
My understanding is that:
1) the maven-clover2-plugin creates a classified artifact with the -
clover classifier. it also looks for -clover classified artifacts of
project
The dependency artifacts should already be transitive. I'm not quite
sure how you are seeing the results you are. Have you tracked the
output of the swizzling process? Does -X show what is then fed into
the compiler plugin in the forked lifecycle?
- Brett
On 03/02/2009, at 3:26 PM, Nick
You're right. the dependency artifacts are already transitive.
e.g. the -X output shows:
[DEBUG] [Clover] List of dependency artifacts after changes:
[DEBUG] [Clover] Artifact [com.fidelity.shares:shares-
domain:jar:clover:1.0-SNAPSHOT], scope = [compile]
[DEBUG] [Clover] List of
2009/2/3 Jason Chaffee jason.chaf...@zilliontv.tv
I am having an issue on 2.0.9. Basicallly, I have a custom plugin that has
it's own packaging type and creates a file of it's own extension type. This
only happens if I run a reactor build. If run maven in that project, it
works correctly.
Well, I was just trying to build maven trunk :) Nothing else.
Georgy
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Oleg Gusakov
oleg.subscripti...@gmail.com wrote:
Georgy Bolyuba wrote:
Hi,
I am new here, so, might be missing something. I am trying to build
maven from trunk and:
I guess, I phrased
37 matches
Mail list logo
