Possible regression using web resource filtering

2009-07-07 Thread Reinhard Nägele
Hello, I am forwarding this to the dev list because it did not get any attention on the users list. I guess the dev list is more appropriate for this anyways. Should I open a Jira? Thanks for any feedback. Thanks, Reinhard Original-Nachricht Betreff:Possible

Re: Possible regression using web resource filtering

2009-07-07 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Hi, There is a bug already, see[1]. Thanks, Stéphane [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-187 On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Reinhard Nägele reinhard.naeg...@mgm-tp.com wrote: Hello, I am forwarding this to the dev list because it did not get any attention on the users list. I guess

Re: [ANN] Maven PDF Plugin 1.0 Released

2009-07-07 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi, According the rst plugin page [1], it uses generated-site dir. Unfortunately, the PDF plugin doesn't handle this dir right now. Please create an issue [2]. A patch is always welcome! Cheers, Vincent [1] http://jrst.labs.libre-entreprise.org/maven-jrst-plugin/jrst-mojo.html [2]

Re: [ANN] Maven PDF Plugin 1.0 Released

2009-07-07 Thread Tony Chemit
Le Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:42:45 -0400, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi, According the rst plugin page [1], it uses generated-site dir. Unfortunately, the PDF plugin doesn't handle this dir right now. Please create an issue [2]. A patch is always welcome! Hi :) We made

Re: Incorrect license metadata after inheriting org.apache:apache:6

2009-07-07 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, the copyright year in the NOTICE file should (AFAIK) be the year of publication of the compilation (e.g. the jar artifact) instead of the range of years of during which the contents of the compilation have

Re: Incorrect license metadata after inheriting org.apache:apache:6

2009-07-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
I'm not sure I agree with this change. Why should it just be the present year? If the jar contains schemas or other works that are copyright over the entire range, why would it NOT be the full range? Dan On Tue July 7 2009 11:15:23 am Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at

Re: Incorrect license metadata after inheriting org.apache:apache:6

2009-07-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tue July 7 2009 11:22:38 am Daniel Kulp wrote: I'm not sure I agree with this change. Why should it just be the present year? If the jar contains schemas or other works that are copyright over the entire range, why would it NOT be the full range? The text on the apache legal page

Re: svn commit: r791464 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractFixJavadocMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/FixJavadocMo

2009-07-07 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi Vincent, Author: vsiveton Date: Mon Jul 6 12:38:12 2009 New Revision: 791464 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=791464view=rev Log: o added MavenOpts for the invoker Modified:

Copy transitive dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread Costin Caraivan
Hello, I have a plugin which needs to download copy somewhere the transitive dependencies of the project's dependencies (at least level 1, I'll see about the rest). So I have this: project - dependencies - transitive dependencies. I extracted artifacts from the direct dependencies, so this part

Re: svn commit: r791464 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractFixJavadocMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/FixJavadocMo

2009-07-07 Thread Brett Porter
On 08/07/2009, at 2:25 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Modified: maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/ apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractFixJavadocMojo.java maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/test/java/org/

Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

2009-07-07 Thread John Casey
I think that the codebases are diverging enough that it makes sense to separate them. I'd only say we should do this if we move both, though...and I guess we'd need to move the maven 2.x branches over with maven/* as well. +1 -john Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I did some of the branch and

Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

2009-07-07 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: In the spirit of fresh start, does it make sense for moving components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN? +0 There's already a maven-1 directory so for the sake of consistency I would expect maven-X instead of mavenX. Benjamin

Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

2009-07-07 Thread John Casey
Sure, that sounds fine for consistency. I do think this is a good idea in concept, though. Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Brett Porter wrote: In the spirit of fresh start, does it make sense for moving components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN? +0 There's already a maven-1 directory so for the

Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

2009-07-07 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I did some of the branch and version maintenance I mentioned in the other mail. In the spirit of fresh start, does it make sense for moving components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN? If so, would someone actively working on it like to

Re: Copy transitive dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread Samuel Le Berrigaud
Hi Costin, I assume you have a project defined in your plugin's mojo, i.e.: /** * The Maven Project * * @parameter expression=${project} * @required * @readonly */ private MavenProject project; Then getting *all* the dependencies (including the transitive ones) of your project is as

Re: Copy transitive dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread Brian Fox
Take a look at the maven-dependency-plugin copy-dependencies code, this is pretty much exactly what you're trying to do. There are filters that are in a common jar you can reuse to filter out transitivity etc. On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Samuel Le Berrigaudsamuel.lb.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

2009-07-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
I have a massive checkin coming and when I'm finished that I'll sync up with Benjamin and swizzle the branches. On 7-Jul-09, at 2:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I did some of the branch and version maintenance I mentioned in the other

Developed new maven plugin for Jlint

2009-07-07 Thread Christopher Moraes
Hi, I have developed a maven plugin for Jlint 3.1 and want to contribute the plugin code back to the maven project. I've gone through the maven developer documentation, but somehow cannot find instruction related to contributing plugin source code. Can someone please point me to any instructions