On 07/01/2010, at 2:37 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
After looking through the code, I came up with two possible fixes for this:
1. Fix it in wagon-scm by automatically creating the missing directories
when an error is encountered during checkout when a deployment is performed.
Instead of changing
2010/1/7 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:26 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
On 07/01/2010, at 1:16 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:41 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
however you might have to wait for install as the attached
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 18:36 -0800, Dan Fabulich wrote:
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
In this process I removed your original implementation, simply because
it allowed me to work freely in simplifying my own implementation (and I
truly believe I managed to make some good simplifications). I
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:37 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
I realized that the prime subject of contention is the injected
resources - maybe ONLY that. So scheduling attached to phases or
plugins is really ultimately not the prime target. When thinking of
Dan's Antrun plugin requirement
Hi,
+1.
Tested on company builds with success.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2010/1/6 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
We solved 29 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=15996
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Hi,
I would prefer using the --parents option too.
The issue already exists [1].
I have reverted due to the svn 1.5 requirements.
BTW, this change can be added in this project [2]. And you can use
this provider (svnjava) instead of the svnexe one.
--
Olivier
[1]
No problem here.
Many projects build with m2eclipse (from trunk), with the maven3-alpha-6
BTW, I'd like to generalize to our Hudson instance, but it seems
Hudson still didn't support maven 3.0 :(
2010/1/7 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
Hi,
+1.
Tested on company builds with success.
Thanks,
2010/1/7 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:37 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
I realized that the prime subject of contention is the injected
resources - maybe ONLY that. So scheduling attached to phases or
plugins is really ultimately not the prime
Ok, thanks for all your inputs :) I'll look into these suggestions..
-Deng
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I would prefer using the --parents option too.
The issue already exists [1].
I have reverted due to the svn 1.5 requirements.
BTW, this
+1, works for work projects
-Steohen
2010/1/6 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
We solved 29 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=15996
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Henri Gomez wrote:
BTW, I'd like to generalize to our Hudson instance, but it seems
Hudson still didn't support maven 3.0 :(
Just use free-style projects and you're free to use any Maven version
you like.
Benjamin
-
To
BTW, I'd like to generalize to our Hudson instance, but it seems
Hudson still didn't support maven 3.0 :(
Just use free-style projects and you're free to use any Maven version you
like.
i'd like to but about 250 projects to update ;(
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 10:17 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Side note:
Now that sounds like the concurrency code I wrote to convert from
Accurev to Subversion
I actually ended up creating the state of a stream at a specific
revision because it was asked for (by a downstream
2010/1/7 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 10:17 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Side note:
Now that sounds like the concurrency code I wrote to convert from
Accurev to Subversion
I actually ended up creating the state of a stream at a specific
What is your proposal here - did you want to vote those 3 people in as
committers on the basis of the contribution, or will the existing committers
apply patches until the rest of us get to know them? (I don't know who they
are, so we may already). Funnily enough these alternatives have
On 08/01/2010, at 1:55 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
What is your proposal here - did you want to vote those 3 people in as
committers on the basis of the contribution, or will the existing committers
apply patches until the rest of us get to know them? (I don't know who they
are, so we may
+1
runs fine on my company and apache projects with no problems so far.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
From: Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-6
To: Maven Developers List
Currently you can only say compile is outputDependenant upon itself,
meaning it'll wait for compile in all upstream projects to finish
before proceeding. We also need to be able to specify the explicit
target of the dependency, so you could say test is outputDependant on
compile in all
Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-)
On 7 Jan 2010, at 23:20, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently you can only say compile is outputDependenant upon
itself,
meaning it'll wait for compile in all upstream projects to finish
before proceeding. We also need to be able to
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 Jan 2010, at 23:20, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently you can only say compile is outputDependenant upon itself,
meaning it'll wait for compile in all upstream projects to finish
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
I will re-add your stuff, and I will also set it up to use my output
demultiplexer that causes output to appear in normal order.
Does the demultiplexer do anything in weave mode when threads=1? Does it
make the projects appear to unweave (as far as the log is
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design Best Practices (23 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
Ok the vote is far past the minimum time and the votes are unanimous.
Welcome to the Maven project Kristian. Your account request has
already been submitted; it can take several days before the account is
created.
--Brian Fox
Maven PMC Chair
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Petar Tahchiev
On 1/8/10, Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com wrote:
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
I will re-add your stuff, and I will also set it up to use my output
demultiplexer that causes output to appear in normal order.
Does the demultiplexer do anything in weave mode when threads=1? Does it
make the
24 matches
Mail list logo
