Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

2010-04-06 Thread Stephen Connolly
Eh, small correction to that vote AFAIK I am not on the PMC, so my vote AFAIK is non-binding -Stephen On 5 April 2010 19:35, Milos Kleint mkle...@gmail.com wrote: The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Milos Kleint, Stephen Connolly, John Casey, Nicolas de Loof,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

2010-04-06 Thread Milos Kleint
oups, you are right, sorry about that. I was checking against http://people.apache.org/~jim/projects.html#maven-pmc and your name showed up but I missed that it showed in maven but not maven-pmc. Same applies to Nicolas. The correct result is +1 (binding): Milos Kleint,, John Casey, Olivier Lamy

[ANN] Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2 Released

2010-04-06 Thread Milos Kleint
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Compiler Plugin, version 2.2 This plugin provides the capability to compile the java sources and newly also to process annotations in jdk 1.6. See the plugin's site for ore details:

Re: [DISCUSS] MNG-3226 - Developers and Contributors information is not being inherited

2010-04-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Benjamin, Benjamin Bentmann wrote at Thursday, 1. April 2010 19:57: Hi, another model building issue I would appreciate comments on. Right now, developers and contributors are only inherited if the child doesn't specify those at all. By specifying developers/contributors, a child POM

Re: [DISCUSS] MNG-3226 - Developers and Contributors information is not being inherited

2010-04-06 Thread Arnaud Héritier
I already saw this feature explained in several locations but I never saw a release not talking about it's availability. (We learn new things every day with maven !!) Is there a doc somewhere ? Arnaud On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] MNG-3226 - Developers and Contributors information is not being inherited

2010-04-06 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Jörg Schaible wrote: The current behavior should stay as default. However, combine.children=append should be supported for the developer's and contributor's node also like it is done for other lists. The pitfall here is that combine.children is only available for plugin configuration, not

Re: [DISCUSS] MNG-3226 - Developers and Contributors information is not being inherited

2010-04-06 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 6 April 2010 12:57, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote: The current behavior should stay as default. However, combine.children=append should be supported for the developer's and contributor's node also like it is done for other lists. The

Re: [DISCUSS] MNG-3226 - Developers and Contributors information is not being inherited

2010-04-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Stephen Connolly wrote at Dienstag, 6. April 2010 14:48: On 6 April 2010 12:57, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote: The current behavior should stay as default. However, combine.children=append should be supported for the developer's and

// builds for beta 1 (MNG-3004), going for commit

2010-04-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I am going to commit my changes for MNG-3004 to M3 for beta 1. The change consists of the following: * A modularization of the DefaultLifecycleExecutor into smaller components. This is primarily done with the intention of extracting execution strategy somewhat from the rest of the logic. //

Re: // builds for beta 1 (MNG-3004), going for commit

2010-04-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Apr 6, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: I am going to commit my changes for MNG-3004 to M3 for beta 1. The change consists of the following: * A modularization of the DefaultLifecycleExecutor into smaller components. This is primarily done with the intention of extracting

Re: // builds for beta 1 (MNG-3004), going for commit

2010-04-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
If you think that in Linear mode you're going to affect the behavior that we have right now that's a bit of a problem. he Sorry if I was unclear. Linear mode is not affected and should be pretty much in the clear for future changes too. It's the way we want it. * From a maven-core

Re: // builds for beta 1 (MNG-3004), going for commit

2010-04-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Apr 6, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: If you think that in Linear mode you're going to affect the behavior that we have right now that's a bit of a problem. he Sorry if I was unclear. Linear mode is not affected and should be pretty much in the clear for future changes