Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Expected SNAPSHOT dependencies should be in the pom IMHO, since each bits of
build info should be there so that mvn compile is sufficient.
I agree that we need to aim for a short command line but I'm not
convinced the POM can help us here. To me, it looks like a valid
+1
Emmanuel
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Paul Gier pg...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We solved 9 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11125version=16504
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
On 15/09/2010, at 2:26 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
Hey guys,
I was wondering what was happening with the new release of the
maven-release-plugin? Things seemed to go quiet on that front this past
week or so...
I see that the SCM plugin got released tho, would be good to get the release
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
I have no solution right now and need to think about this some more.
The approach that I could think of to sufficiently address this issue
requires quite some rework of the settings.xml or better a different
file in order to not break side-by-side use of Maven 2.x
On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
I have no solution right now and need to think about this some more.
The approach that I could think of to sufficiently address this issue
requires quite some rework of the settings.xml or better a different
Hi
I saw that John added http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-502 with
a wish for Java 1.5. This is fine, but I think we need to discuss the
contents of the coming versions.
Over the last year or so I've tried to get rid of as many alpha and beta
plugins as possible. We are now down to only
On 09/14/2010 05:03 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Paul Gier wrote:
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-023/
Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-antrun-plugin-1.5/
+1, although it's unfortunate that the example POM snippets on the site
Paul Gier wrote:
I will try to do a 1.5.1 release next week with the site updates.
Well, I won't stop you from going all fancy and do another release just
for a site update. But if you just tweaked your local copy before
deploying the 1.5 site, I wouldn't have a problem with that either.
On 09/15/2010 12:37 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Paul Gier wrote:
I will try to do a 1.5.1 release next week with the site updates.
Well, I won't stop you from going all fancy and do another release just
for a site update. But if you just tweaked your local copy before
deploying the 1.5
Hi,
We solved 3 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11134styleName=Htmlversion=16518
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11134status=1
Staging repo:
Hi,
in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive
can get source and binary bundles from this URL:
On 09/15/2010 12:49 PM, Paul Gier wrote:
On 09/15/2010 12:37 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Paul Gier wrote:
I will try to do a 1.5.1 release next week with the site updates.
Well, I won't stop you from going all fancy and do another release just
for a site update. But if you just tweaked
Hi,
We solved 1 issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12100styleName=Htmlversion=16674
There is still an issue left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12100status=1
Staging repo:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-027/
Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ejb-plugin-2.3/
+1
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
alpha and beta tags are better handled as 0.x.y version numbers in any
case. once you hit 1.0.0 there should be no need for an alpha or beta tag
unless you have the commitment to run the real release within a month or two
-Stephen
On 15 September 2010 18:28, Dennis Lundberg
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Expected SNAPSHOT dependencies should be in the pom IMHO, since each bits
of build info should be there so that mvn compile is sufficient.
I agree that we need to aim for a short command line but I'm not
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
I have no solution right now and need to think about this some more.
The approach that I could think of to sufficiently address this issue
requires quite some rework of the settings.xml or better a different
sisu? I found it in githug [1] or ci grid [2], but there is no explanation
any pointer or wiki to let us understand (and let me chage the dependency
documentation with consistent information)?
regards,
Hervé
[1] http://github.com/sonatype/sisu/
[2] https://grid.sonatype.org/ci/job/sisu/
Le
is this a formal vote (with speedup option to get more users feedback)?
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hi,
in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
19 matches
Mail list logo
