Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Tools shared component version 1.3

2010-11-22 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 -Lukas On 11/21/2010 10:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761styleName=Htmlversion=16051 There are still no issues left in JIRA! Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-019/

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.1-RC1

2010-11-22 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
After having been actually bitten by [MNG-4907http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4907] (which is a good thing) and then fixing it, the build passed fine. Great job ! +1 (non-binding) 2010/11/21 Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net Question about the future release. I just created a test project

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.1-RC1

2010-11-22 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Baptiste MATHUS wrote: I just created a test project from archetype, and tried -T option. And surefire shows up as being locked onto the 2.5 version, should/couldn't 3.0.1 be locked onto 2.6 one I didn't feel comfortable making Surefire 2.6 the default in light of SUREFIRE-615 but that's

Re: svn commit: r1036834 - in /maven/archetype/trunk: ./ archetype-common/ archetype-common/src/main/mdo/ archetype-models/ archetype-models/archetype-catalog/ archetype-models/archetype-catalog/src/

2010-11-22 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi Hervé, actually, everything (Maven CLI console output AND the surefire output) is in commit log: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1036834 If helps: MacOSX, 1.6.5, java 1.6.0_22 (the boxed one), Maven trunk, locally built (Apache Maven 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT (r1035629; 2010-11-16

Re: Patch for ARCHETYPE-303

2010-11-22 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Sure, will try to keep up. I had a year ago (while doing nexus-archetype-plugin) a discussion with Raphael Pieroni (sorry for ASCII-zation of his name!), is he The Man to ping? Thanks, ~t~ On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.frwrote: Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010,

Re: Solving SUREFIRE-141 ; pluggable providers

2010-11-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
What if we provided some of a core utilities like the classpath scanning, forking, and reporting services and made individual plugins like a junit-maven-plugin, and testng-maven-plugin? I know that Cedric would work on a testng-maven-plugin but isn't overly keen on working on Surefire. If we

Re: Solving SUREFIRE-141 ; pluggable providers

2010-11-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'm also thinking of parity with Eclipse where separate runners have been created, and anything that helps the CLI execute as it does it the IDE helps. I know that at least for TestNG if Cedric worked on both the Eclipse plugin (which he does) and the Maven plugin we'd probably be closer to

Re: Solving SUREFIRE-141 ; pluggable providers

2010-11-22 Thread Igor Fedorenko
How do we make sure different plugins use parameter names consistently? I would like to align Tycho OSGi test plugin with Surefire, for example, but I don't see a way to do this, to be honest. -- Regards, Igor On 10-11-22 04:05 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: What if we provided some of a core

Re: Solving SUREFIRE-141 ; pluggable providers

2010-11-22 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
ma., 22.11.2010 kl. 16.05 -0500, skrev Jason van Zyl: What if we provided some of a core utilities like the classpath scanning, forking, and reporting services and made individual plugins like a junit-maven-plugin, and testng-maven-plugin? This is what I am working on ATM. Getting the