Re: Maven ITs seem to have problems now running in parallel

2012-09-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I'm not sure I ever ran the core IT's in parallel; and I dont think benjamin did either...? Kristian Den 1. sep. 2012 kl. 04:20 skrev Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io: I rebased the ITs for Maven I have and I notice now that the setup I had now fails to run ITs in parallel. I do a touchstone

the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Mark Struberg
    Hi! While doing further research on the incremental build I came accross the org.sonatype.plexus.build.incremental.BuildContext. There are a few things around this class which caught my interrest. 1.) This class has a package org.sonatype, the artifact name groupId org.codehaus.plexus

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Anders Hammar
1) Yes. :-) 2) I also quite surprisingly noticed this as well while converting a plugin to use BuildContext and making it m2e compatible. IMO it would be great if DefailtBuildContext could be improved so that will detect changes. However, there might be some good reason this hasn't been

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sep 1, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! While doing further research on the incremental build I came accross the org.sonatype.plexus.build.incremental.BuildContext. There are a few things around this class which caught my interrest. 1.) This class has a package

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin version 2.0

2012-09-01 Thread Mark Struberg
code builds fine, license headers are fine, real project builds fine as well But your key is missing in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/project/KEYS Can you please add them (must be the one with yout apache.org email). I'll then check it and cast my vote. LieGrue, strub -

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:40:11 +0200 schreef Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io: On Sep 1, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! While doing further research on the incremental build I came accross the org.sonatype.plexus.build.incremental.BuildContext. There are a few things around this

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin version 2.0

2012-09-01 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 now, key is fine. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org; Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com Cc: Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
None of the code we have, and are using today, is bound to m2e. On Sep 1, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: Op Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:40:11 +0200 schreef Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io: On Sep 1, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! While doing further research on the

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Mark Struberg
Hence we haven't really published anything. Well, not quite true. The examples I gave were taken from the released project which is used in maven already. But you are right, incremental builds is a hard nut and hard to crack for a single person. The API you defined is a starting point, but I

Re: svn commit: r1379726 - in /maven/shared/trunk: file-management/pom.xml maven-artifact-resolver/pom.xml maven-filtering/pom.xml maven-invoker/pom.xml maven-jarsigner/pom.xml maven-runtime/pom.xml m

2012-09-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Shouldn't most of these be inherited from the shared-parent instead? On 2012-09-01 11:26, strub...@apache.org wrote: Author: struberg Date: Sat Sep 1 09:26:55 2012 New Revision: 1379726 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1379726view=rev Log: MSHARED-239 update non-crucial plugins to

Re: svn commit: r1379726 - in /maven/shared/trunk: file-management/pom.xml maven-artifact-resolver/pom.xml maven-filtering/pom.xml maven-invoker/pom.xml maven-jarsigner/pom.xml maven-runtime/pom.xml m

2012-09-01 Thread Mark Struberg
you are right. I will recheck the effective dependency versions and kill out the versions if not needed. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org To: dev@maven.apache.org Cc: Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 11:16 PM Subject: Re: svn commit:

org.codehaus.mojo.jspc:jspc-compiler-tomcat6:2.0WHATEVER

2012-09-01 Thread Martin Gainty
Devs I found jspc-compiler-tomcat6 was missing plugin.xml when testing today here is the signature groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo.jspc/groupId artifactIdjspc-compiler-tomcat6/artifactId version2.0/version I downloaded the jspc-compiler-tomcat6 version 2.0 and found maven-plugin did not build