Re: [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.3

2012-10-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
And a +1 from me. On 2012-09-28 08:08, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 7 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150styleName=Htmlversion=18298 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.3

2012-10-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Olivier Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold, Mark Struberg, Hervé Boutemy, Stephane Nicoll, Dennis Lundberg +1 (non binding): Tony Chemit, Baptiste Mathus I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On 2012-09-28 08:08, Dennis

Re: PLXCOMP-1 and improving compiler-message parsing

2012-10-01 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 28 September 2012 18:15, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote: On 9/28/12 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 Imo this comes hand in hand with moving maven-core to 1.6 as well and a version bump to mvn-3.2.0 or even mvn-3.5.0 We might create a documentation page about Strategies for

[ANN] Maven WAR Plugin 2.3 Released

2012-10-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven WAR Plugin, version 2.3 Builds a Web Application Archive (WAR) file from the project output and its dependencies. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin You should specify the version in your project's plugin

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Given this milestone will be available in central repo [1], I don't see any problem: I created MNG-5354 to track this. Of course, as requested by our dependency policy [2], we need a formal vote approved by PMC majority: this intent declaration is useful before calling for a formal vote just to

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Given this milestone will be available in central repo [1], I don't see any problem: I created MNG-5354 to track this. Cool, thanks. Of course, as requested by our dependency policy [2], we need a formal vote approved