Oracle recently changed its approach to version numbers for the JDK in which
minor version numbers get skipped, depending on the type of update. Pretty
sure there weren't 10 new JDK 5 releases.
--
Robert Patrick robert.patr...@oracle.com
VP, FMW Architects Team: The A-Team
Oracle
Hello there,
2013/7/16 Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Lennart Jörelid
lennart.jore...@gmail.comwrote:
This is not (or should not be) an entirely technical question - support
for
various versions of JDK may be the simpler criterion to discuss, but I
2013/7/17 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
2013/7/17 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
On 16 July 2013 23:01, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
Until Jenkins gets upgraded to 1.520+ at which point the (crappy in my
personal view) Maven job type will be unable to
On 17 July 2013 10:09, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2013/7/17 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
2013/7/17 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
On 16 July 2013 23:01, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
Until Jenkins gets upgraded to 1.520+ at which point
Note that to have the fix and be able to use Maven 3.1.0, jenkins users
will have to upgrade which won't be soon for many of them
(Myself I'm using the latest really stable one : the 1.480 LTS)
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17
That would likely be a fix that any organizations providing longer term
support would likely backport for their enterprise versions of Jenkins...
On 17 July 2013 10:53, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that to have the fix and be able to use Maven 3.1.0, jenkins users
will have
If you check out log4j 2 trunk and run: mvn clean site, you get a
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError. Shouldn't this work out of the box? All is
well with 3.0.5. Should I configure something magic or create a JIRA?
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
Hm, I do see here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound
that the site plugin needs to be updated, but we cannot do that because it
causes a NullPointerException in site:stage-deploy.
Gary
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Gary Gregory
hello
did you check this page out :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound
Regarding maven site plugin, it says that 3.3 is compatible with 3.1
HTH,
Anthony
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote:
If you check out log4j 2 trunk
I think I've boiled it down to a site plugin issue and reported
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-695
But no Maven 3.1 for Log4j 2 for now...
Gary
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Anthony Dahanne anthony.daha...@gmail.com
wrote:
hello
did you check this page out :
Le mardi 16 juillet 2013 22:42:23 sebb a écrit :
On 16 July 2013 22:37, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
Typo on my part. There are 48 things to change when updating a release.
I updated and triggered the publish an hour ago. I'm not sure when/how it
updates.
Should be immediate
+1
Op Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:12:02 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte
rfscho...@apache.org:
Hi,
We solved 3 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530styleName=Htmlversion=19426
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Hervé BOUTEMY, Olivier Lamy, Robert Scholte
+1 (non binding): Tony Chemit
-1 (non binding): Mirko Friedenhagen
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Op Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:12:02 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte
Is 3.0.5 still the preferred version? I ask because the right-hand aside is
still Get Maven 3.0.5 -- which makes sense if 3.1 is not GA, but I think
it is, right?
PS: None of the release-notes.html pages include the release date. Can this
information be added (in the future)? It is difficult to
-
Arnaud
Le 17 juil. 2013 à 21:14, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org a écrit :
Is 3.0.5 still the preferred version? I ask because the right-hand aside is
still Get Maven 3.0.5 -- which makes sense if 3.1 is not GA, but I think
it is, right?
For me the GA status is mainly related to
Just checking the ci-aggregator job [1]
I noticed is has been disabled with the following message:
Disabled until you work out how not to use up all the storage on the
server.
I think we first need to resolve this before asking to install M3.1
In the meantime I'll try to execute it on my
Le mercredi 17 juillet 2013 14:13:38 Paul Benedict a écrit :
Is 3.0.5 still the preferred version? I ask because the right-hand aside is
still Get Maven 3.0.5 -- which makes sense if 3.1 is not GA, but I think
it is, right?
PS: None of the release-notes.html pages include the release date.
Great link, but what links to it? I would certainly have viewed that page
if it was accessible and visible through the site's home page.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.frwrote:
Le mercredi 17 juillet 2013 14:13:38 Paul Benedict a écrit :
Is 3.0.5 still the
Hi,
I've got a regression here using the Swagger Maven Plugin [1] that looks
different to the Aether one. Before I go poking around further, I was wondering
if anyone can tell me if it's a regression on the Maven (and dependencies) end,
or something expected to be updated in the plugin?
Hi
Got the exact same issue with another plugin.
Le 18 juil. 2013 06:43, Brett Porter br...@apache.org a écrit :
Hi,
I've got a regression here using the Swagger Maven Plugin [1] that looks
different to the Aether one. Before I go poking around further, I was
wondering if anyone can tell me
20 matches
Mail list logo
