Re: maven development tools for m2e

2013-12-02 Thread Grzegorz Słowikowski
Hi I'm new to Maven plugin M2Eclipse integration. I've imported my plugin (with custom packaging) I want to integrate with M2Eclipse and some test projects using this packaging. When playing with lifecycle-mapping-metedata.xml (changing actions for different mojos) I found that I have to delete

[VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). Details: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527version=18783 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/ Staged site:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
-1, for the following reasons * No checksum of the source bundle in the email, per current vote email format: FTR SHA1 of bundle I checked is a0fdae255eebc2dfbd0f973073f7c97284b5f9f9. * The source bundle does not build. If I look at the difference between the tag and the source bundle I see the

Re: maven development tools for m2e

2013-12-02 Thread Igor Fedorenko
This list is meant to discuss development of maven itself. If you haven't already, please ask your question of m2e-us...@eclipse.org. -- Regards, Igor On 12/2/2013, 3:06, Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote: Hi I'm new to Maven plugin M2Eclipse integration. I've imported my plugin (with custom

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 2 December 2013 22:34, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: -1, for the following reasons * No checksum of the source bundle in the email, per current vote email format: FTR SHA1 of bundle I checked is a0fdae255eebc2dfbd0f973073f7c97284b5f9f9. * The source bundle does

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Monday, 2 December 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote: On 2 December 2013 22:34, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: -1, for the following reasons * No checksum of the source bundle in the email, per current vote email format: FTR SHA1 of bundle I checked is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 3 December 2013 11:18, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, 2 December 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote: On 2 December 2013 22:34, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: -1, for the following reasons * No checksum of the source

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: For some reasons I don't understand yet why defaultExclude=false doesn't work for CVS directories. Uh, isnt that supposed to be yes to enable the exclusion of default patterns? Gruss Bernd

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 3 December 2013 12:52, Bernd Eckenfels e...@zusammenkunft.net wrote: Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: For some reasons I don't understand yet why defaultExclude=false doesn't work for CVS directories. Uh, isnt that supposed to be yes to enable the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Benson Margulies
I dunno, change the version to 2.0 and remove support for CVS? On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: On 3 December 2013 12:52, Bernd Eckenfels e...@zusammenkunft.net wrote: Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: For some reasons I don't

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
now that: 1. the problem is known 2. its impact estimated low: only tests for CVS provider IMHO, we can afford releasing as is and creating a Jira issue to find a better solution later Regards, Hervé Le mardi 3 décembre 2013 12:47:55 Olivier Lamy a écrit : On 3 December 2013 11:18, Stephen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 need to find a workaround for CVS provider unit tests later Regards, Hervé Le lundi 2 décembre 2013 19:38:41 Olivier Lamy a écrit : Hi, We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). Details:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-737 created Le mardi 3 décembre 2013 03:05:17 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : +1 need to find a workaround for CVS provider unit tests later Regards, Hervé Le lundi 2 décembre 2013 19:38:41 Olivier Lamy a écrit : Hi, We fixed 11 issues. The new

need some help with verifier release

2013-12-02 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I am trying to stage maven-verifier 1.5 but having some troubles creating the release tag during release:prepare. The error message I get shows some odd SVN URL, but I am not sure where it comes from. Here is the error [INFO] Checking in modified POMs... [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd

Re: need some help with verifier release

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
It looks the pom contains the wrong scm information: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-verifier/pom.xml scm connectionscm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tags/maven-verifier-1.5/connection

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time… But is ist possible, that my commit d1f102e5223e5fe0f852e1a5becb497f0e860d6a is actually causing this issue? Its an exclude of some CVS stuff I had in my untracked list all the time when doing a full build... regards Domi On

Re: need some help with verifier release

2013-12-02 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Thank you, Olivier, it'd have taken me forever to figure this out by myself! (I had troubles with svn authentication earlier today and accidentally committed modified pom.xml while I was troubleshooting it). -- Regards, Igor On 12/2/2013, 23:31, Olivier Lamy wrote: It looks the pom contains

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
No worries. IMHO it's not the problem. Issue is cvs-commons module. -- Olivier On Dec 3, 2013 3:34 PM, Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch wrote: Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time… But is ist possible, that my commit d1f102e5223e5fe0f852e1a5becb497f0e860d6a is