On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 September 2014, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
>> is there something about IP process for such established code?
>>
>> I see something like 10 components (we won't take plexus-containers)
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> is there something about IP process for such established code?
>
> I see something like 10 components (we won't take plexus-containers)
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Plexus+dependencies
>
> And what about the fact that i
is there something about IP process for such established code?
I see something like 10 components (we won't take plexus-containers)
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Plexus+dependencies
And what about the fact that it is not in org.apache and not Apache License?
I'm really willin
GitHub user jontodd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/47
Support for TestNG successPercentage
TestNG has the concept of "successPercentage" where a probabalistic test
can be run some number of innvoations and then if the successPercentage is met,
Can we not just pull the code in? IIUC it is pretty much only us that uses
the code...
On 2 September 2014 22:18, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Gang, doesn't the board of the ASF have very strong, negative,
> feelings about ASF PMC's controlling and maintaining code outside of
> the ASF? I confess
Gang, doesn't the board of the ASF have very strong, negative,
feelings about ASF PMC's controlling and maintaining code outside of
the ASF? I confess that I found this whole topic extremely confusing,
what with the googlecode 'Apache Extras' business. We might want to
ask for some clarification be
Hi,
On 9/2/14 2:56 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I asked Github to give us github.com/maven for our 3rd party code but someone
is using it. Maybe Hervé can setup github.com/apachemaven and we can move those
Git repositories there.
Unfortunately github.com/apachemaven is also occupied already...
Hi,
On 9/2/14 6:17 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Herve and I discussed moving the repos before splitting them, but it
made sense to just go ahead and split it first because that was easier
and quicker to pull off. If we can get them into an Apache repo, that
makes sense.
Sounds great to me...github.com
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12123&version=17274
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MACR%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
Staging re
Herve and I discussed moving the repos before splitting them, but it
made sense to just go ahead and split it first because that was easier
and quicker to pull off. If we can get them into an Apache repo, that
makes sense.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Note that we rec
I asked Github to give us github.com/maven for our 3rd party code but someone
is using it. Maybe Hervé can setup github.com/apachemaven and we can move those
Git repositories there.
On Sep 2, 2014, at 3:09 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> We have started talking about moving them somewhere, an
Note that we recently split the repos up at Sonatype to make this less
cumbersome; Brian hands out access pretty much on request. At least,
he did for _me_.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> We have started talking about moving them somewhere, and the time may
> have com
We have started talking about moving them somewhere, and the time may
have come tom restart that discussion.
You can either ask Brian for access or have one of the existing
committers apply your pull request. Just a regular pull request from
github should do.
Kristian
2014-09-01 22:37 GMT+02:00
13 matches
Mail list logo
