3.3.1: Memory Usage

2015-03-18 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi, it seems to get my standard complaint about every new Maven version, but we're currently stuck to Maven 3.0.5. One reason is the vast memory usage of any later version. We have currently ~450 projects in the reactor, now compare the results of a simple validate: Maven 3.0.5:

[GitHub] maven pull request: MNG-5786: Fix edge case in determining maven.m...

2015-03-18 Thread Stephan202
GitHub user Stephan202 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/40 MNG-5786: Fix edge case in determining maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory. See [MNG-5786](https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5786) for details. The commit message explains the issue in different

Problems signing up on the dev list ?Problems signing up on the dev list ?

2015-03-18 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Markus Karg complains that he's been trying to sign up on the dev list, can anyone check what's up ? Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.1 Release

2015-03-18 Thread Stephen Connolly
Yep. https://github.com/eirslett/frontend-maven-plugin/pull/178 is the pull request that has been merged to fix the issue with that plugin On 16 March 2015 at 15:04, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 March 2015 at 14:43, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote:

Re: svn commit: r1667514 - /maven/site/trunk/content/xdoc/download.xml.vm

2015-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
Danke, I missed that. On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:54 AM, ol...@apache.org wrote: Author: olamy Date: Wed Mar 18 11:54:56 2015 New Revision: 1667514 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1667514 Log: Maven 3.3 requires JDK 1.7 or above, Modified: maven/site/trunk/content/xdoc/download.xml.vm

Maven site broken - no download or documentation link for 3.2.5 available

2015-03-18 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, a colleague of mine just noticed, that some links are broken: - on http://maven.apache.org/index.html the links for Maven 3.2.5 point to the documentation of Maven 3.1.1 - on http://maven.apache.org/download.cgi 3.2.5 is not offered anymore. I am a friend of supporting only the newest and

Re: Maven site broken - no download or documentation link for 3.2.5 available

2015-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
Fixed, and I pushed another publish. Thanks! On Mar 18, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@apache.org wrote: Hello, a colleague of mine just noticed, that some links are broken: - on http://maven.apache.org/index.html the links for Maven 3.2.5 point to the documentation

Re: svn commit: r1667647 - /maven/site/trunk/content/markdown/docs/3.3.1/release-notes.md

2015-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
Just for the record, Karl didn't ask me to link to his notes but he took the time to write them, they are comprehensive so I have no issue with linking to them. I'm thankful someone wrote them. I honestly don't mind where they are. On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:09 PM, jvan...@apache.org wrote:

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Maven Invoker 2.2

2015-03-18 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, this release contains a critical fix for Windows users who want to invoke Apache Maven 3.3.1. Due to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5776 the start-script has been renamed from mvn.bat to mvn.cmd, which caused that the Invoker couldn't find the executable file anymore. We solved

Re: Jekyll experiment

2015-03-18 Thread Fred Cooke
Well, if you created it, then a personal thank you from me for that. I would never use it for normal web stuff, but for the autogenerated stuff like PMD, checkstyle, findbugs, cross ref code, javadocs, etc etc it's GREAT at release time to give you a reference of what was. Or during dev, when one

Re: Jekyll experiment

2015-03-18 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Jason, On 3/19/15 4:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Anyone interested in trying a Jekyll experiment for our website? Extract the useful documentation we believe there is and try to make working on the site a pleasurable experience that is easy for users to contribute to? That's one the

Re: Jekyll experiment

2015-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
Yup, personally not interested. Jekyll probably has several orders of magnitude more users. Now if there were a Jekyll compatible implementation in Java, sure I'd use that :-) I just like that the tool is well supported and everyone uses it, and even if you don't want to actually install it

Jekyll experiment

2015-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
Anyone interested in trying a Jekyll experiment for our website? Extract the useful documentation we believe there is and try to make working on the site a pleasurable experience that is easy for users to contribute to? I'd like to try this because after this last release I'm frankly tired of

Re: Jekyll experiment

2015-03-18 Thread Aldrin Leal
you seen JBake? I wrote its Maven Plugin http://docs.ingenieux.com.br/project/jbake/ -- -- Aldrin Leal, ald...@leal.eng.br Master your EC2-fu! Get the latest ekaterminal public beta http://www.ingenieux.com.br/products/ekaterminal/ On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io

Re: Jekyll experiment

2015-03-18 Thread Barrie Treloar
On 3/19/15 4:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Anyone interested in trying a Jekyll experiment for our website? I'm not familiar with Jekyll. I've noticed sphinx-doc and asciidoctor. I'm currently reading the jekyll documentation...

Remove Maven ant tasks from site

2015-03-18 Thread Manfred Moser
Hi! Given the EOL of Maven 2.x and the fact that the Maven Ant tasks are based on Maven 2 .. can we EOL them and remove them off the site as well? People wanting use use Maven based resolution should be directed to the Aether Ant tasks .. they work very well for me. manfred

Re: Maven site broken - no download or documentation link for 3.2.5 available

2015-03-18 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Jason, sorry, I still do not see the correct link release 3.2.5 in the side bar or in the download.cgi. Regards Mirko Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Wed,

Re: Maven site broken - no download or documentation link for 3.2.5 available

2015-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
Let me perform some ritual sacrifices and see if I can get the site to publish. On Mar 18, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Jason, sorry, I still do not see the correct link release 3.2.5 in the side bar or in the download.cgi. Regards Mirko

[ANN] Apache Maven JavaDoc Plugin Version 2.10.2 Released

2015-03-18 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven JavaDoc Plugin, version 2.10.2 http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/ The Javadoc Plugin uses the Javadoc tool to generate javadocs for the specified project. plugin

Re: Maven site broken - no download or documentation link for 3.2.5 available

2015-03-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
Ha! Killing some chickens and doing my special dance worked it seems. On Mar 18, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: Let me perform some ritual sacrifices and see if I can get the site to publish. On Mar 18, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com

Re: Maven site broken - no download or documentation link for 3.2.5 available

2015-03-18 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Jason, yeah those moves did the trick ;-)... On 3/18/15 9:06 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Ha! Killing some chickens and doing my special dance worked it seems. On Mar 18, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: Let me perform some ritual sacrifices and see if I can get the

Re: Suggestions User Information about Maven 2.2.1 EoL / Plugins / JDK

2015-03-18 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, i have incorporated the suggestions/ideas/improvements https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven2eol/blob/master/message.txt If you have adds/supplementals/etc. please send a pull request or you can create an issue... The list of Maven versions / JDK requirements should be listed on the

Re: [VOTE] Suggestions User Information about Maven 2.2.1 EoL / Plugins / JDK

2015-03-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, I like this, and the comments from Hervé an Robert. Here is another suggestion. We could start using 3-digit version numbers for all M3-only plugins. I.e. start with 3.0.0 for most of them, except for those on the exceptions list. Den 14 mar 2015 14:09 skrev Karl Heinz Marbaise