I had a few private email discussion with Deng: it seems he is facing a known
issue with Java 7 + Kerberos enabled ssh servers + Jsch that was already faced
by:
- Ant: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53437
- Mule: https://www.mulesoft.org/jira/browse/MULE-6864
and probably others
Le vendredi 1 mai 2015 15:14:05 Andreas Gudian a écrit :
Anyone who has ever done a release of a large plugin like surefire from a
european location knows what a pain it is to svn-commit a couple of
thousand files. It takes hours, but only if you're lucky and the process is
not interrupted by
option 3 is confusing
I like option 1, I find it more clear than option 2: I don't think we'll have
scalability issues, since the evolution we need to document won't change in
the future
notice that using Markdown, or perhaps html, you could use colspans to merge
content that is the same
Hi Gary,
I haven't expressed that in the VOTE...otherwise i would have given it
like this:
The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus.
which i haven't done.
Usually we don't use lazy census here on the dev list...(Not that i
remember)...
Kind regards
Karl
Currently surefire is dependent on snapshot version:
maven-shared-utils-0.8-SNAPSHOT.
When do we plane the release of 0.8 ?
Cheers
Tibor
Hi Gary,
On 5/3/15 9:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
And this is a LAZY VOTE?
I beg your pardon?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
Gary
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de
mailto:khmarba...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
We solved 10 issues:
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Gary,
On 5/3/15 9:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
And this is a LAZY VOTE?
I beg your pardon?
Please see https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
Just curious.
Gary
Kind regards
Karl
Github user juherr closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/90
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Gary,
I haven't expressed that in the VOTE...otherwise i would have given it
like this:
The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus.
which i haven't done.
Usually we don't use lazy
Le jeudi 30 avril 2015 19:26:54 Daniel Kulp a écrit :
On Apr 30, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi,
i would like to know if there are any objections to make a final release
of the maven-eclipse-plugin ?
No objections to doing the release. Objection
GitHub user ChrisGWarp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/33
Scm 775
This pull requests implements the SCM-775 functionality needed to support
workItem/Tasks for scm deliver operations. Currently implemented for Jazz, the
base work applied, will allow
Hi Hervé,
On 5/3/15 11:24 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
it is already done
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/index.html
http://maven.apache.org/issue-tracking.html
what is the site part you're looking at, please?
I think he means the site of the plugin itself..
it is already done
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/index.html
http://maven.apache.org/issue-tracking.html
what is the site part you're looking at, please?
Regards,
Hervé
Le vendredi 1 mai 2015 09:54:47 Martijn Dashorst a écrit :
Would be cool if the site was updated wit the new location of
5 gig? wow...
I think a whole lot of of the pages is garbage that no one ever really
reads. No, not the docs itself ;-) - I'm talking about the many many source
xref and javadoc pages (both main and test code) And every single of
those pages is updated on every release because they all
Hi Dennis,
i would prefer Option 2 cause it's extensible...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 5/2/15 12:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to visualize which version of the Checkstyle plugin
includes which predefined rulesets. There's are 3 alternatives for you
to look at here:
Hello,
when searching around for special constructs or when I have to need to
understand some third party error messages I like to visit Java code on
the Web as it safes me the need to check it out and especially it
offers (usually) a good search and navigation.
So this is by definition not for
Op Fri, 01 May 2015 22:59:05 +0200 schreef Dennis Lundberg
denn...@apache.org:
Hi,
After doing some work on the Checkstyle Plugin today, I noticed that
several of our Jenkins jobs for plugins are failing. I looked into it
and found a couple of problems.
1. maven-invoker-plugin is added as a
I'd prefer option 1
Robert
Op Sun, 03 May 2015 11:09:46 +0200 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY
herve.bout...@free.fr:
option 3 is confusing
I like option 1, I find it more clear than option 2: I don't think we'll
have
scalability issues, since the evolution we need to document won't change
in
Hi,
We solved 10 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926version=12331574
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1186
And this is a LAZY VOTE?
Gary
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 10 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926version=12331574
Staging repo:
20 matches
Mail list logo
