Op Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:27:55 +0200 schreef Stuart McCulloch
:
PS. the following test projects use an explicit source+target level of
1.5 which need updating to 1.6 to pass on jdk9:
core-it-suite/src/test/resources/mng-3203/pom.xml
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-142740267
@juherr
Please consider these integration tests as a hint.
These are typical tests using `parallel` parameter.
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-142747818
Hi @lamyaa
What should we do with this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/96#issuecomment-142758232
@lamyaa
Did you have time to run this test using the fix we talked about in
`SUREFIRE-1144`?
Is the execution time calculation broken ?
If it is not
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/2#issuecomment-142749714
@kpiwko
@gastaldi
@marcusholl
What can we do about this old issue?
My suggestion is to propose SPI in Surefire 3.x where hacking system
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-142768756
@Tibor17 I haven't had a chance to look at junit47 provider yet. I'm hoping
to get to it (as well as surefire-1144) this weekend.
---
If your project is set up