[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1194] reporter argument doe...

2015-12-14 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-164604785 @juherr Pls close this issue. I made additional updates and pushed your commit to the master. Thx for contributing. --- If your project is set up for

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

2015-12-14 Thread Tibor Digana
JUnit 4 End Of Life I have a strong reason to use Java 8 in Surefire project. For more information read this https://github.com/junit-team/junit-lambda/issues/31 Cheers Tibor On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5854925...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > i

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

2015-12-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The new module can/may require jdk8. It may even be possible to build the provider with an older jdk - it depends on what they do in JUnit 8; most of the lambda stuff can be used from older versions - but if they expose jdk8 types on public api's there's not much alternative. From a practical

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1194] reporter argument doe...

2015-12-14 Thread juherr
Github user juherr closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1194] reporter argument doe...

2015-12-14 Thread juherr
Github user juherr commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-164675576 @Tibor17 Ok. But I still don't understand why it is working on my computers: I don't have guice-2.0.jar and exclude it was enough. For my information,

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

2015-12-14 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2015-12-14 um 01:16 schrieb Tibor Digana: i agree with stephenc that major version change = API change. the longer we put off updating the baseline JDK *in core* the worse the pain will be in 2-3 years for us when developing and maintaining our plugins We can always open a Vote but then

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

2015-12-14 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2015-12-14 um 12:52 schrieb Tibor Digana: JUnit 4 End Of Life I have a strong reason to use Java 8 in Surefire project. For more information read this https://github.com/junit-team/junit-lambda/issues/31 Terrible policy. EoL is announced several months for a proper and important framework

Re: CI Failures (core-integration-tests-*)

2015-12-14 Thread Olivier Lamy
jars from versions are not deleted so lib directory is a mix of plenty different versions of librairies. anyway to fix that? That's a bit chicken and egg build because I build a new maven with the current version I want to replace... :-) On 14 December 2015 at 11:15, Olivier Lamy

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

2015-12-14 Thread Andreas Gudian
> JUnit 4 End Of Life > > I have a strong reason to use Java 8 in Surefire project. > For more information read this > https://github.com/junit-team/junit-lambda/issues/31 Hi Tibor, Wouldn't it be enough to only build the new Junit-5 provider with source/target level 8 (if that would even be