Am 2016-08-06 um 20:35 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
On 8/6/16 8:29 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 20:24 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 8:20 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 20:01 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 7:46 PM, Michael
On 8/6/16 8:29 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 20:24 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 8:20 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 20:01 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 7:46 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 19:38 schrieb Karl
Am 2016-08-06 um 20:24 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 8:20 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 20:01 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 7:46 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 19:38 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
I have accidently
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 8:20 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 20:01 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 7:46 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 19:38 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
I have accidently committed a change in Git with a log message which
Am 2016-08-06 um 20:01 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 7:46 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 19:38 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
I have accidently committed a change in Git with a log message which
contains wrongly encoded characters...
What is the best to
Hi Michael,
On 8/6/16 7:46 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-08-06 um 19:38 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
I have accidently committed a change in Git with a log message which
contains wrongly encoded characters...
What is the best to handle this?
git commit --amend ..
and
git push -f
Am 2016-08-06 um 19:38 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
I have accidently committed a change in Git with a log message which
contains wrongly encoded characters...
What is the best to handle this?
git commit --amend ..
and
git push -f
The ASF server will probably block history rewrite.
Hi,
I have accidently committed a change in Git with a log message which
contains wrongly encoded characters...
What is the best to handle this?
git commit --amend ..
and
git push -f
?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
-
To
+1
Sorry I missed this in my original implementation. I should have added a
test too.
--
Regards,
Igor
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Christian Schulte wrote:
> Am 08/06/16 um 16:08 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
> > So the question is WDYT ?
>
> +1
>
> Consistency. Almost all properties
Hi all -
the request for the skip-parameter started as a requirement to break an
infinite loop. When I discovered how the plugin was used and told that
binding the plugin to a different phase, the loop was gone. Even
though, the request for the skip parameter stayed.
Untrue. I opened
Am 06.08.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Robert Scholte:
fooled. So it must be javadoc:fix + compiler:compile + scm:commit.
The Maven-way would be a lifecycle for things like that, right? Like the
clean or site lifecycle. A general purpose "manage source code"
lifecycle with phases like
Am 08/06/16 um 16:08 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
> So the question is WDYT ?
+1
Consistency. Almost all properties can be overridden from the command
line. I see no reason why 'maven.config' should not be overridable from
the command line as well.
Regards,
--
Christian
Hi,
I have a question concerning the .mvn/maven.config file..and the command
line options. Currently the order is that the .mvn/maven.config file is
analyzed first and afterwards the options from commandline so I thought
I could do something like this:
.mvn/maven.config:
Hi Robert,
On 8/6/16 3:42 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Karl Heinz,
I think what you should do is add -am and maybe even -amd to the
arguments. There should be no reason to run mvn install, even when using
the incremental module builder.
The more I'm thinking about this I come to the
Hi Karl Heinz,
I think what you should do is add -am and maybe even -amd to the
arguments. There should be no reason to run mvn install, even when using
the incremental module builder.
Robert
On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:38:44 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
Hi
Hi Robert,
On 8/6/16 3:27 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Karl Heinz,
the interface and implementation of the logger are separated. It should
pick up the logger implementation as defined for the Maven runtime. If
that's not the case, then we have an issue here.
It works as you describe it..no
Am 08/06/16 um 11:35 schrieb Robert Scholte:
> I consider the javadoc:fix goal in the same range as the release:prepare
> release:perform combination (why as is everything executed twice) and
> cobertura-maven-plugin (why are the tests executed twice) and the fix-goal
> is probably even
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/110
I will start release 2.19.2 with this fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Hi Robert,
On 8/6/16 3:22 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Karl Heinz,
This all sounds like repository policies[1], so something that should be
part of Aether.
Disabling such repositories should prevent them from downloading.
(assuming --offline is not an option)
From a plugin of MavenProject
Hi Karl Heinz,
the interface and implementation of the logger are separated. It should
pick up the logger implementation as defined for the Maven runtime. If
that's not the case, then we have an issue here.
thanks,
Robert
On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:01:55 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Karl Heinz,
This all sounds like repository policies[1], so something that should be
part of Aether.
Disabling such repositories should prevent them from downloading.
(assuming --offline is not an option)
From a plugin of MavenProject point of view I'm not interested in the
logic behind
Hi,
On 7/31/16 1:03 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi Robert,
e.g. I
still like your scm-extension idea which detects the changed files and
only executes those projects + "-am -amd".
Yes...this is true...
So first working PoC is now there..
Of course the subject should be "DI of Components" ..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
On 8/6/16 1:01 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
i have a question concerning DI
If I have the following code:
public class XX {
@Inject
private ScmManager scmManager;
During the run in Maven this will
Hi,
If I do a mvn install with a project all artifacts are being installed
into my local cache..
The question I have:
Can I somehow identify if an artifact is already been in my local cache
or not (within a Maven plugin or extension)?
Something like:
if (artifact is in local cache) {
Hi,
i have a question concerning DI
If I have the following code:
public class XX {
@Inject
private ScmManager scmManager;
During the run in Maven this will automatically looked up and injected
into this attribute...so fine so far...
But is it possible to provide a different
Hi all,
the request for the skip-parameter started as a requirement to break an
infinite loop. When I discovered how the plugin was used and told that
binding the plugin to a different phase, the loop was gone. Even though,
the request for the skip parameter stayed.
I consider the
26 matches
Mail list logo