[GitHub] maven pull request #138: MNG-6306 remove Guava usage from maven-resolver-pro...

2017-11-24 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/138 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

[GitHub] maven pull request #138: MNG-6306 remove Guava usage from maven-resolver-pro...

2017-11-24 Thread slachiewicz
GitHub user slachiewicz opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/138 MNG-6306 remove Guava usage from maven-resolver-provider You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/slachiewicz/maven feature/MNG-6306

[GitHub] maven-scm issue #56: [SCM-739] Use shallow clones when cloning a git repo

2017-11-24 Thread arteam
Github user arteam commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/56 I like the proposal, but I am a a little bit confused. Does the new parameter should be added to the `executeCheckOutCommand` method (like `recursive`) and be implemented by the all

[GitHub] maven-indexer pull request #23: Full codebase reformat, minor cleanup, no co...

2017-11-24 Thread cstamas
GitHub user cstamas opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/23 Full codebase reformat, minor cleanup, no code/logic change Reformatted full codebase, as there was mixed formatting, and checkstyle did report a huge amount of errors. Now, mostly the

[GitHub] maven-indexer pull request #21: Prepare for next major release (6.x)

2017-11-24 Thread cstamas
Github user cstamas closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/21 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

[GitHub] maven-indexer issue #21: Prepare for next major release (6.x)

2017-11-24 Thread cstamas
Github user cstamas commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/21 Manually merged, only 1st two commits from this PR, while 3rd commit pulled out and merged separately (https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/commit/339eec6052a74fea91a99da2e33cbbd6a95aee3f)

[GitHub] maven-indexer pull request #22: MINDEXER-108: Lift the wildcard prefix restr...

2017-11-24 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/22 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

[GitHub] maven-indexer pull request #22: MINDEXER-108: Lift the wildcard prefix restr...

2017-11-24 Thread cstamas
GitHub user cstamas opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/22 MINDEXER-108: Lift the wildcard prefix restriction MINDEXER-108: lift the prefix restriction Historically Lucene needed this, but latest versions can cope with it. This is still OOM

Re: Dependency scopes and conflict resolution: Possible bug?

2017-11-24 Thread Andreas Sewe
Jonathan Haber wrote: > As a workaround you can check out the dependency-scope-maven-plugin we > wrote: > https://github.com/HubSpot/dependency-scope-maven-plugin Thanks for the pointer; this indeed looks like a useful plugin. That being said, I wasn't experiencing this bug/misfeature myself.

Re: Dependency scopes and conflict resolution: Possible bug?

2017-11-24 Thread Andreas Sewe
Robert Scholte wrote: > You're hitting MNG-5739 > > Within a dependency-tree a groupId+artifactId is unique (nearest wins). > Such a dependency has 1 version, but also 1 scope. > By setting it explicit to test, you reduce the scope and it is not > available during compile anymore. > > Is this