here is my +1
sadly, the build is not fully reproducible, I'll need to investigate why...
I need more votes, please
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Hervé BOUTEMY"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 26 Janvier 2020 01:16:20
Objet: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Parent
technically we can shade microprofile, metrics/dropwizard or even sirona
but maven requires quite a different model. A typical example is the expiry
or weighted model will not fit the reporting maven needs (very long running
instances vs "batch" like executions) and the weighted impl can be an
Il Mar 28 Gen 2020, 13:30 Lennart Jörelid ha
scritto:
> Would it be possible to use an existing standard for the specification of
> such a metrics API?
>
In my opinion we should have our own model, Maven will impose this new API
to plugins and we cannot depend on third party tools as Romain
Would it be possible to use an existing standard for the specification of
such a metrics API?
Something like a shaded version of Microprofile Metrics, where the API can
consist entirely of Annotations.
(There are programmatic approaches as well, but I suppose we are interested
in limiting the
Il giorno mar 28 gen 2020 alle ore 09:15 Romain Manni-Bucau <
rmannibu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 generally since all extensions doing that report wrong data
> -1 to use a mainstream impl if not shaded - it would just bring us new
> conflicts i think.
>
Totally agree.
In my view any "impl"
+1 generally since all extensions doing that report wrong data
-1 to use a mainstream impl if not shaded - it would just bring us new
conflicts i think.
Side note being: we can start we just counters so no lib is fine imho.
Le mar. 28 janv. 2020 à 08:56, Enrico Olivelli a
écrit :
> Hi,
> I
