Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à 18:09, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Sat 4 Jul 2020 at 16:54, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à 16:38, Stephen Connolly <
> > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > > On Sat 4 Jul 2020 at 10:21, Romain
Hi Romain,
Do you expect another phases (life cycle) for specific technologies or
packaging.
What phases would you expect in case of frontend technologies, e.g.
JavaScript-like Angular, ReactJS, Vue?
What phases in case of scrip-like technologies and native technologies?
Should these phases be har
On Sat 4 Jul 2020 at 16:54, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à 16:38, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > On Sat 4 Jul 2020 at 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Well, there are two points I'd like to emphasis:
> > >
> > > 1. I dont t
Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à 16:38, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Sat 4 Jul 2020 at 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Well, there are two points I'd like to emphasis:
> >
> > 1. I dont think we should wait for 2 majors to get that as a feature,
> would
> > be
On Sat 4 Jul 2020 at 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Well, there are two points I'd like to emphasis:
>
> 1. I dont think we should wait for 2 majors to get that as a feature, would
> be too late IMHO
Well does my dynamic phases PR do what you need?
> 2. Pom model is based on inheritance w
maven-file-management seems much more broadly used. I'm not sure we
can get rid of it. I tried pulling it out of maven-jar-plugin but it
seems more critical there, unless there's some other way to manage
filesets and patterns I don't know about.
INFO] +- org.apache.maven.shared:file-management:jar
Am 2020-07-01 um 11:25 schrieb Maarten Mulders:
Hi all,
Ever since I started contributing on Maven, I noticed that there's one
integration test that fails on my machine (a Macbook). The test is
located in the MavenITmng6386BaseUriPropertyTest class, more
specifically the testitMNG6386UnicodeChar
Well, there are two points I'd like to emphasis:
1. I dont think we should wait for 2 majors to get that as a feature, would
be too late IMHO
2. Pom model is based on inheritance whereas years showed composition and
reuse is saner so IMHO it does not belong to pom but .mvn
Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à
Robert Scholte:
There is a feature toggle, see
https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-model-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/feature/Features.java#L34
Awesome - I’ll get that a play and report back.
Does this mean that the install:install did work?
That would be interesting.
I
Stephen had an idea for it in Model 5.0.0[1], and IIRC I still had my concerns.
It is still a draft with a lot of ideas, that hasn't really been discussed yet,
because it was still out of reach.
However, we're getting closer
Robert
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/POM+Mode
On 4-7-2020 08:08:00, Mark Derricutt wrote:
I thought I’d responded - this has been a long time coming, and has been
discussed numerous times over the past few years, and I’m quite excited to
give it a bash, and see how well it works, and see if/what any implications
this has for our tiles-maven-
Hello Jaroslav,
I might have missed the message on the dev@netbeans mailinglist. Based on the
responses in ponymail[1] I think I've answered them all (I don't know which one
came from netbeans).
I haven't tried it with any IDE, my main goal is that Maven itself keeps
working as expected and I'v
I agree I mixed both in my explanationcause they only make sense
together for a build as shown by the pre/post recurrent request which aims
to enrich the lifecycle to bind custom plugins.
Today projects are no more just about creating a jar - war are no more
about java etc... - most of the tim
13 matches
Mail list logo
