not working and give reasons and workarounds like
the ones you suggest. I'm fine with either outcome.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-35
On a side note,... Happy new year to all! :)
-David
On Dec 30, 2011, at 2:22 AM, Ansgar Konermann wrote:
Am 27.09.2011 14:48 schrieb David
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:09 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Did some more digging and it seems the issue is in the apache-10 parent pom.
If you alter it like so, the arguments are passed as expected:
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
Is it a known issue that the release plugin does not honor the -Darguments?
Specifically, I'm attempting to:
mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true -Darguments=-DskipTests=true
-DfailIfNoTests=false
It takes 40 minutes to get through a dryRun with tests on. We still have
several kinks in the
this on the command line?
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 27, 2011, at 5:40 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Is it a known issue that the release plugin does not honor the
-Darguments?
Specifically, I'm attempting to:
mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true -Darguments=-DskipTests=true
-DfailIfNoTests
ljnelson wrote:
Now Ken Saks, spec author for EJB 3.1 is saying sure, whoops, Glassfish
has
a problem, it doesn't consult the *effective* classpath because it doesn't
take into consideration Manifest.MF Class-Path entries. Fine.
But *then *he says something WAY more troubling: that
get a closer look at the hackathon tomorrow.
The good news (sort of) is that Surefire has very few changes
committed since the last release, so a release should be reasonably
straightforward.
- Brett
On 02/11/2009, at 1:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Is there any committer out there who has
Is there any committer out there who has the time to review and commit
this patch?
Would be happy to issue a thank you blog post in the OpenEJB blog to
the committer who gets this functionality in :) Would be a big bonus
for OpenEJB/OpenJPA unit testers to get this or something like it
Sundstrom
* Dan Diephouse
* Dan North
* David Blevins
* Dennis Lundberg
* Edward Povazan
* Emmanuel Venisse
* Eugene Kuleshov
* Guillaume Laforge
* Jacques Morel
* James E. Ervin
* James Macgill
* Jason Dillon
* Jason van Zyl
* Jody Garnett
* Paul
A patch would be great!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:36 AM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Our reports on votes are down :
http://www.sonatype.org/~j2ee-hudson/reports/
https://ci.sonatype.org/view/Reports/
It's certainly a Jira upgrade which broke the xml-rpc
Currently, it's a bit of a trick trying to get a javaagent in use with
your test cases. Here's the boiler plate pom text:
http://cwiki.apache.org/OPENEJBx30/javaagent-with-maven-surefire.html
It'd be really great if we could just do it like this:
plugin
On Aug 10, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Dennis,
Just a follow up on the reports.
The reports generated by Swizzle are here (I restored them):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/reports
And they are checked out in the home directory of Hudson on the CI
server.
On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I think it's OK to do a release of it now, especially if it's
blocking 2.0.10.
I've tested it with CXF and it looks OK there. No regressions in
the dep-reduced pom. It would be NICE if the OpenEJB folks could
do a quick test with
On Mar 14, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
The additions Dain has made to XBean adds things I was just never
interested in like constructor injection and bean factories.
Also xbean-reflect thinks in java.lang.reflect.Type terms so it's
easy to add converters that are
On Jan 18, 2008 12:15 PM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there any way to get or make a tree of Artifact objects?
I've tried taking the list of Artifacts returned from
project.getArtifacts(), then wrapping them in my own node object
and
relinking them via the info
It occurs to me I'd really like the ability to apply exclusions at a
more general level than each individual dep. We have ton of excludes
(136), some deps want to pull in the world, and a very good chunk of
them are redundant. Doing a grep/sort/uniq looks like 68 of them are
redundant.
On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi David,
On 19/01/2008, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still digging through that code, but hopefully you can answer this
question real quick. The resulting structure is definitely a tree as
opposed to a graph (which could be fine
Is there any way to get or make a tree of Artifact objects?
I've tried taking the list of Artifacts returned from
project.getArtifacts(), then wrapping them in my own node object and
relinking them via the info in the dependency trail. This works fine
except that there is some information
dkulp wrote:
I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it
for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well.
OpenEJB, actually. And here's my +1! (non-binding)
-David
--
View this message in context:
I need the ability to include/exclude classes from certain artifacts
when creating the shaded jar. In OpenEJB we have a situation where
one of the jars we are adding to the shaded jar contains a class also
part of another jar added to the shade. The class in question truly
belongs to one
))
Which would prevent any addDirectory, addRemappedClass, or addResource
calls. Could wrap that one if/else but then we'd still get
directories from excluded resources/classes.
-David
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, David Blevins wrote:
I need the ability to include/exclude classes from
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Thanks for reviewing!
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
David,
I'm OK with you committing this except for a few minor nits:
1) Javadoc for the parameter you added. The description about the
includes/excludes needs
Mauro, is it possible you can publish a new snapshot or update the
perms on the metadata files?
-David
On Jan 15, 2008, at 9:02 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Thanks for reviewing!
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
David,
I'm
dfabulich wrote:
Vote open for 72 hours.
PS Since it's so close to the Gregorian New Year, I'm probably not going
to actually deploy the release until Jan 3 at the earliest, even if the
vote passes. :-)
Where are things at with this? Looking to cut a release of OpenEJB which is
On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Jeff Jensen wrote:
Just not understanding yet the Maven
plans for wiki/site usage. My fear, obviously, is continued
separate
works, as some people I helped with Maven have a not happy-out-of-
the-box
experience, which includes scattered docs - I always have to
at this point?
-David
On 25/09/2006, at 7:37 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Howdy,
As we discussed some time ago, I was going to check in the
distributed continuum once it built and it does with trunk. So I
checked it in so that David Blevins can help me with some tests.
David now has access
So the README.txt is obviously out of date. What's the status on
building and starting up a continuum server?
-David
A bit ago a created a client for Jira which may be useful:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SWIZZLE/Swizzle+Jira
http://swizzle.codehaus.org/swizzle-jira/
-David
On Jul 3, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
+1. Actually I thought there was already a project for this but I was
probably
Woohoo. So what's the status of 1.1 these days?
-David
On Apr 13, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Yes, it will be in 1.1.
Emmanuel
Carlos Sanchez a écrit :
I think this is what it's planned for 1.1 by adding security
through Acegi
On 4/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED
the release of 1.0.3 in few days.
We don't have for the moment a release date for 1.1
Emmanuel
David Blevins a écrit :
Woohoo. So what's the status of 1.1 these days?
-David
On Apr 13, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Yes, it will be in 1.1.
Emmanuel
Carlos Sanchez a écrit :
I think
FYI, I have a library available for manipulating Confluence via XML-RPC
http://cvs.codehaus.org/viewrep/swizzle/swizzle/swizzle-confluence/
src/main/java/org/codehaus/swizzle/confluence
You are unlikely to find anything more complete. I have another one
for Jira as well.
Binaries are
On Apr 5, 2006, at 8:23 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 5, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
I think the best way it to create a wrapper on it like we do it
for irc (with plexus-irc) and jabber (with plexus-jabber) and use
use the wrapper in the notifier. But perhaps, it isn't
On Mar 27, 2006, at 12:25 AM, Adam Leggett wrote:
Im working on an Rss notifier for continuum. Ive added a comment to
CONTINUUM-418 to see if this would be a useful contrib.
In the meantime prior to submitting any patch or feature I have to
decide which baselined version of the source to use
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mercredi 22 mars 2006 22:13
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Distributed Continuum (GBuild)
+1. I've been really looking forward to it.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I have been talking with David Blevins about moving the GBuild
code from
Geronimo over
I need to create an assembly that doesn't put everything under a
artifactId-version style directory; meaning I want it to unzip right
into ./ with no directory prefix such as:
$ unzip openejb-tomcat-3.0.1.zip
deflating ...
./conf/openejb.xml
./server/lib/openejb-core-3.0.1.jar
Venisse wrote:
What about carlos's suggestion?
I'm sorry, but i can't include continuum profiles in 1.0.3
Emmanuel
David Blevins a écrit :
We have too much corba tie-in to the Sun ORB which makes it so we
can't compile a few chunks of the code or test it on anything
other than strict 1.4 vm
on compiler
plugin
David Blevins a écrit :
Sounds like a scary m1-style hack ... not going there.
Second install it is
-David
On Feb 8, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
What about compiler and test plugins options like fork,
executable, ...
On 2/8/06, David Blevins [EMAIL
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-419?page=comments#action_58739
]
David Blevins commented on CONTINUUM-419:
-
And failed builds.
I noticed you now get a link on successful builds. Not to concerned about
checking why something
So i find myself needing jdk 1.4 for 90% of what i have in the
geronimo continuum install, some of those actually can't compile with
1.5 because of corba/vm ties.
But alas I do need 1.5 now for at least two projects.
Do i pretty much have to setup another continuum install for this?
I like this more and more.
-David
On Jan 14, 2006, at 6:12 AM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:13 +0100, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features.
I haven't looked at osuser in particular yet, but I still think it
might
work
David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 12, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
David Blevins a écrit :
On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features.
I tried to use osuser but this framework is crappy :
[...]
I looked
I seem to have gotten a bad snapshot on my last build and now all the
gbuild agents fail on scm update. I was using an old continuum-1.1-
SNAPSHOT but started running into this issue and changed it to
continuum-1.0.2 for sanity sake, but still get the same issue.
Seems to all be triggered
Pom for activeio-2.1
Key: MEV-299
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-299
Project: Maven Evangelism
Type: Improvement
Components: Missing POM
Reporter: David Blevins
Made a valid pom for activeio-2.1
--
This message
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-299?page=all ]
David Blevins updated MEV-299:
--
Attachment: activeio-2.1.pom.patch
Pom for activeio-2.1
Key: MEV-299
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-299
Project
On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features.
I tried to use osuser but this framework is crappy :
[...]
I looked at seraph too. This project seems to be interesting, it's
used by confluence and jira. It seems we have
Castor dependencies
---
Key: MEV-275
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-275
Project: Maven Evangelism
Type: Improvement
Components: Dependencies
Reporter: David Blevins
Added some of the missing deps for castor to run
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-275?page=all ]
David Blevins updated MEV-275:
--
Attachment: castor-1.0M1.patch
Castor dependencies
---
Key: MEV-275
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-275
Project
Just to jump in. I don't really see the limitation with the current
ContinuumStore object. In fact, I would say the only real issue I
see around it is that too many components are dependent upon it which
makes Continuum somewhat database-centric. In most cases these
components are just
I'm still not sure how having multiple build definitions comes into
play. I see now real way to use anything but the default.
It's also a little confusing how the dont-execute-the-build-if-the-
source-hasnt-changed-feature comes into play. They all have their
own schedule and the source
: David Blevins
Priority: Minor
The geronimo build output is around 6 megs and little html text area with
scroll bars is not the best way to search it and view it. It would be great to
have a 'Download as text' link from the results page so that it would be
possible to download the build output
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193?page=all ]
David Blevins reopened MEV-193:
---
Patched activemq-core-3.2.pom
-
Key: MEV-193
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193
Project: Maven
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193?page=all ]
David Blevins updated MEV-193:
--
Attachment: activemq-core-3.2.pom.patch2
ActiveMQ core requires the concurrent library as it states on their website.
Patched activemq-core-3.2.pom
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193?page=comments#action_50908 ]
David Blevins commented on MEV-193:
---
Here is the stacktrace you get without the concurrent jar. Comes from a test
case that uses ActiveMQ
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
EDU/oswego
: David Blevins
Priority: Minor
I am subclassing AbstractContinuumAction in gbuild and need access to these
methods.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-439?page=all ]
David Blevins updated CONTINUUM-439:
Attachment: AbstractContinuumAction.java.patch
Change scope on getType methods in AbstractContinuumAction
Patched activemq-core-3.2.pom
-
Key: MEV-193
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193
Project: Maven Evangelism
Type: Bug
Components: Invalid POM
Reporter: David Blevins
This pom has javacc-2.1 commented out as it doesn't
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193?page=all ]
David Blevins updated MEV-193:
--
Attachment: activemq-core-3.2.pom.patch
Patched activemq-core-3.2.pom
-
Key: MEV-193
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org
: Continuum
Type: Wish
Components: continuum-web
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
A button I could click on the login page to remember me and automatically log
me in next time. Something similar to JIRA or Confluence.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
Priority: Trivial
When you are at the projects page (Summary.vm/fid/continuumProject) it's really
annoying you can't just click somewhere and see the latest build results. You
have to click Build History then the top results item, which
: Improvement
Components: continuum-web
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
Priority: Trivial
It's really odd as the build results page takes over the 'Build' tab. It's
fine if you clicked on the results link *from* the build history page, then you
can just hit the browser
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-419?page=comments#action_49865
]
David Blevins commented on CONTINUUM-419:
-
Super. I'd want to use if for In progress builds too.
Can't click to see the latest build results from the main page
Type: Improvement
Components: continuum-web
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
Instead, think of allowing ViewCVS or FishEye to be configured and create links.
It is *extremely* annoying the way it is now. On OpenEJB, when a project.xml
file is changed, we get this:
modules
: Wish
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
I really like the Build statistics and Changes sections continuum creates
in the emails and definitely want them in every email. It's really just the
section that contains the output generated from the build itself that I don't
want
I have a hard time understanding what exactly build schedules are
supposed to do affect. The default schedule is hourly, but this
doesn't cause builds to be kicked off hourly.
What is the deal here?
-David
irc notifications: support for registered nicks
---
Key: CONTINUUM-406
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-406
Project: Continuum
Type: Improvement
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
Priority
Type: Improvement
Components: continuum-web
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
screen after DeleteNotifier, AddNotifier and similar actions of the project
View page should return you to the project view page, not the list of all
projects. it takes entirely too long
65 matches
Mail list logo
