Re: problem with site-plugin 2.0-beta-6

2008-04-02 Thread Heinrich Nirschl
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ran 209rc6 and as a side effect the site-plugin version got resolved to 2.0-beta-6 which gave me the following problem: ... [INFO] [site:attach-descriptor] [DEBUG] Mapped url: /tmp/dnbnorapi-trunk/src/site to relative path:

Re: [2.0.9 RC5]

2008-03-29 Thread Heinrich Nirschl
Hi, I get the following error wen generating a site for a plugin (with maven 2.0.9-RC5 and maven-plugin-plugin 2.4.1): [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error during page generation Embedded error: No method on class

Re: [2.0.9 RC5]

2008-03-29 Thread Heinrich Nirschl
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Heinrich Nirschl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I get the following error wen generating a site for a plugin (with maven 2.0.9-RC5 and maven-plugin-plugin 2.4.1): [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO

Re: plugin prefix metadata for org.codehaus.mojo got wiped?

2008-03-05 Thread Heinrich Nirschl
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting Contegix to grab it from a backup. Anyone know what happened here? The sablecc and the jpox-modello plugin are in there. Anyone happen to do releases of those? On 5-Mar-08, at 6:25 AM, Milos Kleint

Re: clean doesn't process additionalFileSets consistently

2008-01-10 Thread Heinrich Nirschl
On Jan 10, 2008 12:11 AM, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a chat on #maven with someone trying to delete a folder external to his source tree. This works fine when running the child directly, but in a reactor build it doesn't work. I peeked at the code and was surprised to find

Some plugins missing in metadata

2007-05-18 Thread Heinrich Nirschl
Hi, I just noticed, that some plugins are missing in the http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-metadata.xml file. For example the install or the rar plugin are not listed there. I guess because of this mvn help:describe -Dplugin=install is not working: [INFO]

Re: [Archetypes] plugin proposition

2007-03-31 Thread Heinrich Nirschl
On 3/31/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31 Mar 07, at 10:07 AM 31 Mar 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: Hi here comes a new proposition for the future descriptor. I made it the most simpler i can think. Please comment it. I think it duplicates too much that's in the POM. The POM

Re: [Archetypes] plugin proposition

2007-03-31 Thread Heinrich Nirschl
On 3/31/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31 Mar 07, at 12:08 PM 31 Mar 07, Heinrich Nirschl wrote: On 3/31/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31 Mar 07, at 10:07 AM 31 Mar 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: Hi here comes a new proposition for the future descriptor. I