Re: How do I merge pull request on GitHub?

2015-05-29 Thread Stevo Slavić
On Apache Mahout project we have nice docs on the workflow to merge or reject PRs submitted to github mirror. Maybe it works for you too. Kind regards, Stevo Slavic. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Hi I'm going through the issue list in JIRA for

Re: How do I merge pull request on GitHub?

2015-05-29 Thread Stevo Slavić
https://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote: On Apache Mahout project we have nice docs on the workflow to merge or reject PRs submitted to github mirror. Maybe it works for you too. Kind regards, Stevo Slavic

Re: How do I merge pull request on GitHub?

2015-05-29 Thread Stevo Slavić
instructions correctly the modifications goes something like this: contributor branch@github -- git-wip-us.apache.org -- Apache GitHub mirror What I think that I need is this: contributor branch@github -- Apache GitHub mirror -- svn.apache.org On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Stevo Slavić

Re: [VOTE] ASF Parent POM Version 17

2015-04-27 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, We solved 10 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250version=12329009 Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.3 Release

2014-08-13 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: +1 On 12 August 2014 07:19, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: Hi, Time to release Maven 3.2.3! This release contains the important change of switching to HTTPS transport by default! Please

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) tested on Apache Mahout trunk Kind regards, Stevo Slavic. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 10, 2013, at 12:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The

Re: [VOTE] All new (non-patch) releases of Maven Core after 30th Sep 2013 to require Java 6+

2013-07-23 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.orgwrote: +1 (binding) On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core. Maven Plugins

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0

2013-07-10 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) Apache Mahout builds OK with Apache Maven 3.1.0. Kind regards, Stevo Slavić. On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: +1 (non-binding) Didn't try any of the new stuff explicitly though. /Anders On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Jason van

Re: Maven Upload Requests separate binaries and sources jar restriction

2010-10-22 Thread Stevo Slavić
this: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Uploading+3rd-party+Artifacts+to+Maven+Central On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Apache Maven users, On Maven Upload Request http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD JIRA project summary page

Re: [ANN] Maven Site Plugin 2.1 Released

2009-12-22 Thread Stevo Slavić
Could 2.0.11 be released that would support using maven-site-plugin 2.1? Otherwise there would be no java 1.5 compatible stable maven that could use maven-site-plugin 2.1+. Regards, Stevo. On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@gmail.com wrote: There is no recommendation to

Maven 3.0-alpha-5 and maven-archetype packaging

2009-12-07 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello Maven developers, It seems 3.0-alpha-5 is not compatible with current 2.0-alpha-4 version of maven-archetype-plugin - archetype:create-from-project mojo creates archetype project with packaging maven-archetype, but that packaging seems not to be supported by / valid for 3.0-alpha-5 (see

Re: Maven 3.0-alpha-5 and maven-archetype packaging

2009-12-07 Thread Stevo Slavić
Thanks, fixed, build passes in both maven 2 and 3. Regards, Stevo. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Stevo Slavić wrote: It seems 3.0-alpha-5 is not compatible with current 2.0-alpha-4 version of maven-archetype-plugin - archetype:create

Re: Release plugin documentation request

2009-11-28 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello David, Maybe you can find answers to at least some of questions in following articles: - http://www.vineetmanohar.com/2009/10/23/how-to-automate-project-versioning-and-release-with-maven/ - http://weblogs.java.net/blog/2008/08/31/using-maven-release-plugin Regards, Stevo. On

maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello Maven developers, I'd like just to inform you that while checking out maven archetype I've noticed that there is a maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag created in April 2009; most recent release is 2.0-alpha-4 from September 2008, and current trunk is 2.0-alpha-5-SNAPSHOT, so this existing

Re: maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
this issue prevents archetype-plugin from being fully adopted, especially in (closed source) corporate environments. Regards, Stevo. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: Nice catch, I've removed it. On 12/11/2009, at 7:22 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote: Hello Maven

Re: Site Update for Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
IMO 2.1.0 should stay as it is, if I'm not mistaken, most recent stable release of maven which is compatible with Java 1.4. When maven 2.2.1 is configured as default external maven installation m2eclipse 0.9.9 refuses to build projects (like maven core plugins) which still require Java 1.4. Maybe

Re: [m2eclipse-user] Re: Maven, M2Eclipse, Nexus @ Eclipse DemoCamp in Budapest

2009-06-17 Thread Stevo Slavić
When in Szeged, why not come by to Novi Sad as well? :) Regards, Stevo. 2009/6/16 Tamás Cservenák ta...@cservenak.net Also, two of us will be at University of Szeged on Friday 19th, doing the same we'll be doing some demos and chatting with folks. The beer will came later, most probably at