Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-143544670
@lamyaa
I applied the local change and executed XmlReporterRunTimeIT.
The balancer is really applied and Test1 was really executed within 600
millis.
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-143595744
@Tibor17 I'm very sorry for the delay. Please go ahead and finish this one
if you have time.
I'm not quite sure how XmlReporterRunTimeIT works either. I
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-143595094
@lamyaa
Can I finish it unless you you are already in progress?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-143606448
@lamyaa
Pls close this pull-request. I have pushed the fix including your IT.
Thx for the IT, it was very nice work.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user lamyaa closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-143607529
Thanks for taking care of this @Tibor17
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-141173488
@lamyaa
I will have a look into this test.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:19 PM, lamyaa wrote:
> @Tibor17
dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAYXBhY2hlLm9yZ3wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg==>
> .
> NAML
> <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-141156540
@Tibor17 As I was preparing a new pull request with the simple change:
``createTestSuiteElement( ppw, testSetReportEntry, testSetStats,
reportNameSuffix,
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-140308340
Yes a new pull request would be great. I have made a lot of rework in
surefire. Most probably this branch is not able to merge.
On 9/14/15, lamyaa
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-140148135
@Tibor17 I tried just changing the last parameter like you suggested:
``createTestSuiteElement( ppw, testSetReportEntry, testSetStats,
reportNameSuffix,
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-140152959
@Tibor17
``createTestSuiteElement( ppw, testSetReportEntry, testSetStats,
reportNameSuffix, testSetReportEntry.elapsedTimeAsString() )`` does fix the
issue.
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-140153614
@Tibor17 It seems that we have a check for elapsed time being null in
TestSetRunListerner.java so we never instantiate WrappedReportEntry with a null
elapsed
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-139858232
@lamyaa
I think I found a solution which works on my side with non-parallel tests.
Feel free to tell me what you think about my hypothesis.
Can you
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-139917934
@Tibor17 Please give me a couple of days to look again at this. It's not
very fresh in my mind anymore :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-139915061
IMHO all we need to do is to change the last parameter:
`createTestSuiteElement( ppw, testSetReportEntry, testSetStats,
reportNameSuffix,
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-138134180
@lamyaa
Sorry for waiting so long time. I have finished issue 580.
I will have a look on this since now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user lamyaa opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98
[Surefire-1144] Time for testsuite on commandline does not suit with the
time value given in the report file
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1144
This pull request
18 matches
Mail list logo