t; soon after the JUnit 5 GA release. Otherwise nobody can use JUnit 5
> with
> >> > maven.
> >> > The alternative would be, that JUnit releases the provider
> >> implementation
> >> > when they go GA and after that the code is moved to surefire. The
>
added to the discussion
>> > below:
>> > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Hangout-with-
>> > Marc-Philipp-tp5882740.html
>> > To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email
>> > ml-node+s40175n142166...@n5.nabble.com
>> > To unsubscribe from Mave
for the users.
> >
> > My personal view is, that it would be good to integrate the provider code
> > into maven-surefire as soon as possible, but I not yet firm enough with
> > the
> > code base the be really productive. I hope to get a better understanding
> >
but I not yet firm enough with
> the
> code base the be really productive. I hope to get a better understanding
> of
> the codebase during the next few weeks.
>
> Regards,
> Benedikt
>
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your message will b
Hi,
I've had the chance to talk to Marc Philipp from the JUnit team again, and
I'd like to share with you some of our discussions.
First we talked about the progress with the surefire provider:
Currently I've done not much. We have a junit5 branch with a single PR
merged (the JUnit5VersionsIT). F
