+1
Works fine on my projects
Marc
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. Februar 2007 05:33
An: Maven Developers List
Betreff: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here
Works fine for me, +1
fabrizio
On 2/12/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)
Hi Jason,
The issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2795 (Classloader problem
loading a resource from a build extension Jar) still breaks my
integrations
with this last build of Maven... :-( As you tried the test project
Bellingard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:02 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)
Hi Jason,
The issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2795 (Classloader problem
loading a resource from a build extension Jar) still breaks
Mostly windows, but also some flavors of linux (Fedora 6 and a custom
built kernel).
-Original Message-
From: Fabrice Bellingard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 4:17 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)
Hi Brian
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
On 13 Feb 07, at 9:41 AM 13 Feb 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/
maven/maven-core/2.0.5/ Here is the JIRA roadmap:
Our trunks build fine: +1
Thanks,
Vincent
2007/2/11, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
+1 \o/ woohoo!
On 2/13/07, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our trunks build fine: +1
Thanks,
Vincent
2007/2/11, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
+1 works on my most complicated build, no problems.
2007/2/11, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/mave
n/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA
+1 (I get a binding vote, yay)
Works on our project which includes an uber-archive of artifacts and
an eclipse pde build
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Works on our builds with pde-maven-plugin, native-maven-plugin,
maven-dependency-plugin, and ofcourse java.
-D
On 2/13/07, Barrie Treloar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (I get a binding vote, yay)
Works on our project which includes an uber-archive of artifacts and
an eclipse pde build
+1
Works fine on my projects
Arnaud
On 2/12/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
+1 (non binding).
Tested on all corporate production builds.
--
Olivier
-Message d'origine-
De : Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 12 février 2007 05:33
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)
Hi,
The assemblies that people
Jason van Zyl wrote on Monday, February 12, 2007 7:12 AM:
On 11 Feb 07, at 11:59 PM 11 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are there release notes on the major changes or significant fixes
which we might need to adapt to and/or be able to remove local
build hacks? The JIRA road map is kinda hard
+1 Our builds run fine.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 2/12/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
Hi Jason,
The issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2795 (Classloader problem
loading a resource from a build extension Jar) still breaks my integrations
with this last build of Maven... :-( As you tried the test project
successfully, I don't understand what can be specific to my environment
On 12 Feb 07, at 3:24 AM 12 Feb 07, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote on Monday, February 12, 2007 7:12 AM:
On 11 Feb 07, at 11:59 PM 11 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are there release notes on the major changes or significant fixes
which we might need to adapt to and/or be able to
Fabrice,
On Monday 12 February 2007 10:02, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
The issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2795 (Classloader problem
loading a resource from a build extension Jar) still breaks my
integrations with this last build of Maven... :-( As you tried the test
project
On 12 Feb 07, at 10:02 AM 12 Feb 07, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
Hi Jason,
The issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2795 (Classloader
problem
loading a resource from a build extension Jar) still breaks my
integrations
with this last build of Maven... :-( As you tried the test project
What Dan describes is probably more correct and we should document
this because extensions are really something that executes where you
really just want something on the classpath of the plugin. But as far
as I can tell with the test that I checked in the extension works,
but that should
+1 (non-binding)
Works for our builds.
Thanks!
Dan
On Sunday 11 February 2007 23:33, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA
+1 from me.
On 2/12/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Works for our builds.
Thanks!
Dan
On Sunday 11 February 2007 23:33, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
On 2/12/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
+1 (looking forward to it)
- Joakim
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
+1
Emmanuel
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Excalibur builds fine with this release, no apparent probs spotted.
Thanks,
Jorg
On 12 Feb 07, at 4:06 PM 12 Feb 07, Jorg Heymans wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/
maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Excalibur builds fine with this release, no apparent probs
I've actually been telling people on the mailing list to use
extensions for jar with checkstyle configuration, rather than
plugin-dependencies. The reason was that, in my testing at the time,
if you didn't already have that plugin dependency in your local repo,
it would not search for it in all
+1
Rahul
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
Aha! Apparently this was fixed in Maven 2.0.5, as I just tested and
it failed with 2.0.4, but worked when I tried it right afterward in
2.0.5.
Similarly, I have a project that uses the xfire-generator wsgen task,
and I had it defined as an extension. This works with 2.0.4, but is
broken with
Thanks for the hint, Dan, this actually works perfectly!
I wasn't aware of this way to specify the JAR. It would be worth updating
the documentation of the Checkstyle plugin. I will create a JIRA issue for
this.
FYI, Jason, yes, I've executed the test project on the bane of your
existence ;-)
-
Actually, using build extensions in ways that worked in Maven 2.0.4
now fail in 2.0.5 for me using Fedora Core 6.
- Stephen
On 2/12/07, Fabrice Bellingard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the hint, Dan, this actually works perfectly!
I wasn't aware of this way to specify the JAR. It would
Well, in any case it would be great to integrate the code of
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2676 into the dependencies plugin
and get a release. It is a great help to analyse and fix such situations
(here integrated into our internal info plugin)
The current alpha-2 release is close to ready
Message-
From: Fabrice Bellingard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:02 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)
Hi Jason,
The issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2795 (Classloader problem
loading a resource from a build
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
Are there release notes on the major changes or significant fixes
which we might need to adapt to and/or be able to remove local build
hacks? The JIRA road map is kinda hard to scrape the relevant
details from.
--jason
On Feb 11, 2007, at 8:33 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The
Seems to work fine for Geronimo trunk (2.0) and 1.2 builds...
+1
--jason
On Feb 11, 2007, at 8:33 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/
maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is
On 11 Feb 07, at 11:59 PM 11 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are there release notes on the major changes or significant fixes
which we might need to adapt to and/or be able to remove local
build hacks? The JIRA road map is kinda hard to scrape the
relevant details from.
The only thing
Thanks for the info... seems to be okay so far, build works with
2.0.4 and 2.0.5, will soon run the TCK on the 2.0.5 build to see if
that shows any dependency related failures, but overall it looks good.
There are still a few big issues which we are working around in the G
builds which I
41 matches
Mail list logo
