Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Mark Struberg, Hervé Boutemy, Stephen Connolly, Kristian Rosenvold
+1 (non binding): Evgeny Mandrikov
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
+1
Hervé
Le jeudi 16 juin 2011, Kristian Rosenvold a écrit :
Hi,
The release includes the enforcer-plugin, enforcer-rules and
enforcer-api modules. The site-staging problems from take 1 were fixed
in r1136499. The only diff between this vote and take 1 is the site
deployment.
We
+1
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 19:58, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The release includes the enforcer-plugin, enforcer-rules and
enforcer-api modules. The site-staging problems from take 1 were fixed
in r1136499. The only diff between this vote and take 1 is the
+ 1
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
screen
On 16 Jun 2011 16:58, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
The release includes the
hrm, sorry but I think there is actually a problem now with the stage
site. In r1136499 [1] you removed the version number from the staging
location. I'm not sure if there is a formal rule but we usually stage
the RC sites at a unique location that is kept after the release for
reference.
I am aware of that problem, I did not know how to fix it. If you know
how to do it better, please help. I will test it ;)
I was happy that the project site staged consistently and without manual
intervention according to standard maven deployment procedure. Unless
there actually
is a policy
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 6/17/11, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Enforcer version 1.0.1 - Take 2
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 17, 2011
Hi,
The release includes the enforcer-plugin, enforcer-rules and
enforcer-api modules. The site-staging problems from take 1 were fixed
in r1136499. The only diff between this vote and take 1 is the site
deployment.
We solved 2 issues: