Result:
+1: 3
Now that the parents are released i'll proceed with the release
On 1/17/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Rahul
Jesse McConnell wrote:
> +1
>
> On 1/17/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> - Joakim
>>
>> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>> > It fixes a cou
+1
Rahul
Jesse McConnell wrote:
+1
On 1/17/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
- Joakim
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> It fixes a couple of annoying issues for windows users
>
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11130&fixfor=12484
>
>
> One question,
+1
On 1/17/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
- Joakim
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> It fixes a couple of annoying issues for windows users
>
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11130&fixfor=12484
>
>
> One question, can the 2.0.x branch no longer needed
+1
- Joakim
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> It fixes a couple of annoying issues for windows users
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11130&fixfor=12484
>
>
> One question, can the 2.0.x branch no longer needed be deleted to
> avoid confusion?
> https://svn.apache.org/re
only "feature" is MCOMPILER-48 so i though about releasing trunk as
2.0.2 and then the branch is no longer needed.
On 1/16/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a bit confused... a snapshot of 2.1 is being released as 2.0.2?
How does that relate to the branch? Any changes on trunk that
I'm a bit confused... a snapshot of 2.1 is being released as 2.0.2?
How does that relate to the branch? Any changes on trunk that are
'features' vs 'fixes'?
- Brett
On 16/01/2007, at 5:03 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
All fixed, see below
On 1/14/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-
All fixed, see below
On 1/14/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 (sorry)
* license headers are not updated
kindly fixed by brett
* svn revision needs to be provided
rev# 496418
* staged bundle/snapshot needs to be provided
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repo
-1 (sorry)
* license headers are not updated
* svn revision needs to be provided
* staged bundle/snapshot needs to be provided
otherwise in favour of preparing a release, though.
As for the branch: what was it for before?
- Brett
On 15/01/2007, at 10:25 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
It fixes a
It fixes a couple of annoying issues for windows users
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11130&fixfor=12484
One question, can the 2.0.x branch no longer needed be deleted to
avoid confusion?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/branches/maven-compiler-pl
