[RESULT][VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-20 Thread Daniel Kulp
This vote has been open for 4 days now so I'm going to close it. Results: +1 - dkulp, jvanzyl*, brianf*, jstrachan*, jdillon, dblevins -1 - dfabulich (version number objection) (*) Binding votes There was also a +1 from mauro, but I could not determine if the +1 was for the release or for th

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 17-Jan-08, at 6:24 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote: Responding out of order, techincal stuff first... Daniel Kulp wrote: The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in maven-shade- plugin. It's a bug in ASM and isn't fixable until they provide a fix. (unless someone wants to jump into ASM

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-18 Thread Jason Dillon
+1 --jason On Jan 17, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: Well, I'd prefer to not get into "version number" arguments as it really just doesn't matter.Hell, we have plugins (like the release plugin, dependency plugin, etc..) that EVERYONE uses that haven't had a real release and ot

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-18 Thread James.Strachan
is my +1 > -- > J. Daniel Kulp > Principal Engineer, IONA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-18 Thread Mauro Talevi
Brian E. Fox wrote: It's not entirely true that versions don't matter. Alpha or Beta is really a less important distinction and we are generally trying to move away from more alpha/beta releases. I would argue that since Maven requires Shade to release, that the current version should be 1.0 not

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
DE-9 fix in it. -Original Message- From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:25 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 Responding out of order, techincal stuff first... Daniel Kulp wrote: The fact is MSHADE

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-17 Thread Michael McCallum
I agree 100%, release often its the only way things really get used and tested in the wild... if people have problems they can alway roll back to the last release in the deps... On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:30:51 Brian E. Fox wrote: ... > the people that need them. I'd rather see a release come out wi

RE: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-17 Thread Brian E. Fox
AIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:25 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 Responding out of order, techincal stuff first... Daniel Kulp wrote: > The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in maven-shade-plugin. > It&#x

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-17 Thread Dan Fabulich
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first... Daniel Kulp wrote: The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in maven-shade-plugin. It's a bug in ASM and isn't fixable until they provide a fix. (unless someone wants to jump into ASM code. I don't have the time.) I'm not saying MSH

RE: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-17 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 get it out and that doesn't stop us from doing another release soon. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:22 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 Well, I'd prefer

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-17 Thread David Blevins
ble.com/-VOTE--release-maven-shade-plugin-1.0-beta-1-tp14892803s177p14942018.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-17 Thread Daniel Kulp
Well, I'd prefer to not get into "version number" arguments as it really just doesn't matter.Hell, we have plugins (like the release plugin, dependency plugin, etc..) that EVERYONE uses that haven't had a real release and others (like surefire) that never had a "alpha/beta" release, but pr

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-16 Thread Dan Fabulich
I approve of the idea of releasing another version of maven-shade-plugin, but I don't think we should call it non-alpha until MSHADE-9 is fixed. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-9 If this were called 1.0-alpha-16, I'd give it a +1; as it stands, I have to vote -1 (non-binding). -Dan

Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 16-Jan-08, at 11:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well. This fixes a couple issues we'e run into: ** Bug * [MSHADE-11] - Shaded jars are not unjarrable * [MSH

[VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2008-01-16 Thread Daniel Kulp
I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well. This fixes a couple issues we'e run into: ** Bug * [MSHADE-11] - Shaded jars are not unjarrable * [MSHADE-13] - META-INF/INDEX.LIST files need to be ski