[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60113 ]
Jesse Kuhnert commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
Hi Brett,
The use of that method is decieving in it's current form. The default no args
constructor creates a default listener for
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60115 ]
Brett Porter commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
---
I was just saying that
new TestNG ( false )
is not a particularly help piece of code to read when used.
new TestNG()
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60116 ]
Jesse Kuhnert commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
No I think you're right, I just think it's something I'm not completely in
control of. TestNG tries very hard to provide defaults
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60121 ]
Brett Porter commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
---
it should only require:
cd surefire-testng
vi pom.xml
mvn install
mvn -X might help.
I don't know how you go about getting testng
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60152 ]
Jesse Kuhnert commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
Got it now. Didn't realize TestNG was instantiated in two different places.
The patch supplied only works against the latest
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60166 ]
Brett Porter commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
---
don't worry about uploads. I'll create snapshots from the cvs repository.
I haven't tried building testNG with m2, but I don't think
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60167 ]
Jesse Kuhnert commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
I think it will ~probably~ be possible to build it with m2? There have to be
other projects with seperate source trees for differing
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60176 ]
Jesse Kuhnert commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
Awesome, thanks Brett! I don't use a sun jvm so don't have the javadoc libs
available via normal means. (ibm's jre runs much much
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60059 ]
Jesse Kuhnert commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
I had originally removed this when developing the first round of patches but it
seems to have re-surfaced again. Will do it again
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60060 ]
Brett Porter commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
---
this was by setting the output directory - but that was to
target/surefire-reports which isn't wanted.
ideally, the listeners would
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60064 ]
Jesse Kuhnert commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
I meant fixed in testng itself, it probably got re-enabled somehow. Will report
back when testng get's fixed and if any patches need
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-69?page=comments#action_60088 ]
Brett Porter commented on MSUREFIRE-69:
---
Jesse,
This doesn't seem like the best way to fix this from the TestNG perspective.
Shouldn't it be more explicit?
I assume this is
12 matches
Mail list logo