allery.com/
> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:44:51 +0200
> Subject: Re: [skin][fluido] Menu location
> From: simonetrip...@apache.org
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>
> Hi Robert!
> +1 to your suggestion, I'm playing with another site and just found
> the issue you described :)
On 15.10.2011. 14:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Ivan!
the reason why I started adding menus in 2 places is that while the
sidebar is fixed in the page, the topbar is always available while
scrolling the pages; immagine the skin applied to the Apache Commons
Digester guide[1], once reached the bott
crolling support here.
>
>
>
> -Robert
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:17:55 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [skin][fluido] Menu location
>> From: simonetrip...@apache.org
>> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>>
>> Hi Ivan!
>&
ate: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:17:55 +0200
> Subject: Re: [skin][fluido] Menu location
> From: simonetrip...@apache.org
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>
> Hi Ivan!
> the reason why I started adding menus in 2 places is that while the
> sidebar is fixed in the page, the topbar is always ava
Hi Ivan!
the reason why I started adding menus in 2 places is that while the
sidebar is fixed in the page, the topbar is always available while
scrolling the pages; immagine the skin applied to the Apache Commons
Digester guide[1], once reached the bottom page, users have the
commodity to avoid scr
Hi guys.
The way it is now in sanbox, the from site.xml is rendered in the
side bar and in the top bar. Additionaly are rendered in the
right part of the top bar.
I think there's no reason to have rendered in two places. I can
see several options here:
1. Render the in the top bar, and
