+1
Stephane
On 11/30/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have fixed all the headers and checked them in.
jason.
On 29 Nov 06, at 6:54 PM 29 Nov 06, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Once the headers are fixed, +1
- Joakim
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Jason,
The files still don't have the proper
I'm assuming the parent poms will also need to be released/deployed. Those
still don't have the apache header.
Once that is corrected, +1 (non-binding). Nice work.
Dan
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 18:58, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I have fixed all the headers and checked them in.
jason.
On 30 Nov 06, at 12:45 PM 30 Nov 06, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'm assuming the parent poms will also need to be released/
deployed. Those
still don't have the apache header.
Yup, the whole chain will be released and run through the header
gauntlet.
Once that is corrected, +1
The Remote Resources Plugin does not pass the DOCCK check:
The following documentation problems were found:
o Maven Remote Resources Plugin (5 errors, 0 warnings)
[ERROR] pom.xml is missing the prerequisites tag.
[ERROR] pom.xml has no report plugins configured.
[ERROR]
On 30 Nov 06, at 2:15 PM 30 Nov 06, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
The Remote Resources Plugin does not pass the DOCCK check:
The following documentation problems were found:
o Maven Remote Resources Plugin (5 errors, 0 warnings)
[ERROR] pom.xml is missing the prerequisites tag.
Must have
Hi Denis,
Just did a little checking. The JXR/Javadoc are not added
automatically as it causes the cycle problem. So that's what the
surrogate plugin parent POM is and it has a profile for reporting.
So if you use -Preporting you'll get the reports.
Jason.
On 30 Nov 06, at 2:15 PM 30
Hi Jason
You're quite right about the surrogate parent. I had seen the commits
about it but didn't connect it with the circular dependency problem.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Now, the only error left is about the missing examples. I'll leave the
decision about that up to you.
--
Dennis
On 11/30/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're quite right about the surrogate parent. I had seen the commits
about it but didn't connect it with the circular dependency problem.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Should be using it when publishing the plugin websites, then?
Thanks,
Hi,
This is a group release to attempt to deal with the licensing
resources that need to be packaged up in all the archives we
distribute. This is, in particular, and attempt to deal with the JARs
we release. Namely the binary, source, and javadoc JARs we create
with the JAR, Source, and
Jason,
The files still don't have the proper Apache header on them. You added
the old style (with the copyright date) instead of the new style
documented at:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
Those need to change.
Also, the pom.xml files need to have the header as well. Note:
Once the headers are fixed, +1
- Joakim
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Jason,
The files still don't have the proper Apache header on them. You added
the old style (with the copyright date) instead of the new style
documented at:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
Those need to change.
I have fixed all the headers and checked them in.
jason.
On 29 Nov 06, at 6:54 PM 29 Nov 06, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Once the headers are fixed, +1
- Joakim
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Jason,
The files still don't have the proper Apache header on them. You
added
the old style (with the copyright
I like it, nice way to solve the problem I think. I notice the
javadoc plugin also addresses a problem I had with it a couple of
months ago so I am all for releasing it.
+1
jesse
On 11/29/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have fixed all the headers and checked them in.
jason.
On
+1
On 11/30/06, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it, nice way to solve the problem I think. I notice the
javadoc plugin also addresses a problem I had with it a couple of
months ago so I am all for releasing it.
+1
jesse
On 11/29/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
+1
On 11/29/06, John Tolentino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 11/30/06, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it, nice way to solve the problem I think. I notice the
javadoc plugin also addresses a problem I had with it a couple of
months ago so I am all for releasing it.
+1
15 matches
Mail list logo
