Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-11 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new >> vote, since this one is formally closed? > > The 72 hour waiting time is a minimum, you can certainly let

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new > vote, since this one is formally closed? The 72 hour waiting time is a minimum, you can certainly let it go longer (especially when it runs over a weekend when peopl

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Struberg
the vote is active until one closes it. LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 7/10/11, Benson Margulies wrote: > From: Benson Margulies > Subject: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what? > To: "Maven Developers List" > Date: Sunday, July 10, 2011, 5:58 PM > The vote on

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, Should be better now :-) 2011/7/10 Benson Margulies : > The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new > vote, since this one is formally closed? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven

72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Benson Margulies
The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new vote, since this one is formally closed? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org