Emmanuel Venisse emmanuel at venisse.net writes:
Brett talked about the possibility to fork builds with Continuum [3].
Continuum always forks builds. However, controlling the JDK it used was
not easy. I do believe profiles support will be in the next release and
will make it easy.
Heinicke
Envoyé : mercredi 11 juillet 2007 02:33
À : dev@maven.apache.org
Objet : Continuum and minimum JDK requirement
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous integration
which fails to check JDK 1.4 compliance of Cocoon's code base since Continuum
itself
Brett Porter a écrit :
On 11/07/2007, at 10:32 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous
integration
which fails to check JDK 1.4 compliance of Cocoon's code base since
Continuum
itself is running with a JDK 5 (in that
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous integration
which fails to check JDK 1.4 compliance of Cocoon's code base since Continuum
itself is running with a JDK 5 (in that particular case it was usage of
ThreadLocal.remove() [1]). I found the thread about
On 11/07/2007, at 10:32 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous
integration
which fails to check JDK 1.4 compliance of Cocoon's code base since
Continuum
itself is running with a JDK 5 (in that particular case it was
usage of
just fyi, we are working on getting that profile enabled version
released in the next couple of weeks
jesse
On 7/10/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/07/2007, at 10:32 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous
Dear God, I am so happy to hear that. I swear, I wish I had more
time to track this and contribute, but I'm really really impressed by
this whole team and the progression of this product over the last
year or so.
Christian.
On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:42 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
just fyi,
