On 11/05/2009, at 11:12 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
It's time to start looking at the problems with the current 2.x
resolution
scheme as it specifically relates to repository declaration and
discovery.
Sorry for the delay in responding to this, I'm still catching up on May.
I think the first few
On 18/05/2009, at 12:03 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
Bump.
Maybe it would be better to post the info and discuss here? I don't
think people are going to keep going back to a wiki page to follow the
comments, and it would be good
Bump.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
It's time to start looking at the problems with the current 2.x resolution
scheme as it specifically relates to repository declaration and discovery.
I've created the start of a document at [1]. This should be the
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
Bump.
Maybe it would be better to post the info and discuss here? I don't
think people are going to keep going back to a wiki page to follow the
comments, and it would be good to have it all in the list archives
anyway.
--
It's time to start looking at the problems with the current 2.x resolution
scheme as it specifically relates to repository declaration and discovery.
I've created the start of a document at [1]. This should be the place to
gather feedback and use cases that will help drive towards a more complete
