Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Hard requirements

2019-11-04 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
Thanks. I've rewritten the PR under the assumption that all version ranges are "hard". Please take another look. (PTAL) On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:54 PM Stephen Connolly wrote: > > On Fri 1 Nov 2019 at 21:37, Elliotte Rusty Harold > wrote: > > > Pass 1: > >

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Hard requirements

2019-11-01 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Fri 1 Nov 2019 at 21:37, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Pass 1: > https://github.com/apache/maven-site/compare/master...elharo:patch-34 > > This might not be accurate. In particular I am assuming that if there > are two requirements for [1.0,2.0] and (3.0,5.0) that something will > be picked.

***UNCHECKED*** Re: Hard requirements

2019-11-01 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
Pass 1: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/compare/master...elharo:patch-34 This might not be accurate. In particular I am assuming that if there are two requirements for [1.0,2.0] and (3.0,5.0) that something will be picked. This might not be accurate. If this instead fails the build, please

Re: Hard requirements

2019-10-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Tue 22 Oct 2019 at 11:30, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > The docs at > https://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Dependency_Version_Requirement_Specification > say: > > 1.0: "Soft" requirement on 1.0 (just a recommendation, if it matches > all other ranges for the dependency) > [1.0]: "Hard"

Hard requirements

2019-10-22 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
The docs at https://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Dependency_Version_Requirement_Specification say: 1.0: "Soft" requirement on 1.0 (just a recommendation, if it matches all other ranges for the dependency) [1.0]: "Hard" requirement on 1.0 However, I don't think anywhere do we actually explain what