The versions-maven-plugin is now rewriting XML correctly after some hackery
with woodstox and string index tracking!
I would like to push a snapshot build for others to test (without having to
build from source)
Before I go doing something wrong what do I need to do and how do I do
it!
On 14-Aug-08, at 6:24 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
The versions-maven-plugin is now rewriting XML correctly after some
hackery
with woodstox and string index tracking!
How close is this what we're looking for with rewriting XML properly?
Along the lines of what we were talking about with
It's a bit of a hack
I have another XML Pull Parser in the works that will do this verbatim no
problem but convincing a despot to approve the project request is a bit
trickier!
The current implementation is the ModifiedPomXMLEventReader which takes an
XMLEventReader, wraps it and keeps
Could somebody (not behind a http-proxy) please check out
versions-maven-plugin and deploy the project site?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Stephen Connolly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a bit of a hack
I have another XML Pull Parser in the works that will do this verbatim no
On 14-Aug-08, at 7:33 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
It's a bit of a hack
I have another XML Pull Parser in the works that will do this
verbatim no
problem but convincing a despot to approve the project request
is a bit
trickier!
Can you integrate it into StAX?
The current
The problem, as I see, with StAX is that they all start from the minimal
parser and build up.
i.e.
XMLInputStream accesses the stream directly.
XMLEventReader wraps the XMLInputStream.
So if you follow the StAX API for the minimal parser, you are forced to
either throw away the information you
Oh, yes I forgot to add:
By driving from the event API we can store all the verbatim information in
the XMLEvent objects.
Then our XMLEventWriter sees these XMLEvent objects and (when in verbatim
mode) says they are unmodified, so write them unmodified.
If you create a new or replacement
Personally, I would wrather see these classes added to woodstox. It's then a
single dependency I need. Not a depend on this if we want speed, depend on
that if we want verbatim type thing.It could just be a property on the
InputFactory as to which woodstox would return.
Dan
On
Yah, we can hook you up Tatu. If you're making something else you're
trying to put us in the same boat as Aaron. Your chance of getting us
to use another XML parser is zero.
On 14-Aug-08, at 8:02 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Personally, I would wrather see these classes added to woodstox.
to whom was that comment addressed?
Sent from my iPod
On 14 Aug 2008, at 16:30, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yah, we can hook you up Tatu. If you're making something else you're
trying to put us in the same boat as Aaron. Your chance of getting
us to use another XML parser is
10 matches
Mail list logo
