Thanks guys, will do this tonight. Arrghh, mvn install, not deploy, I don't
how I got those confused!
-aps
On Feb 11, 2008 5:56 PM, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> More comments inside...
>
> 2008/2/11, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > Hey
Hi,
More comments inside...
2008/2/11, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Hey Vincent:
> > No problem. I would love to. I have a really really stupid question.
> >
> > What I've done is:
> >
> > 1) Checked out the 2.0.x trunk
>
> This is not necessary, you can use
Alexander Sack wrote:
Hey Vincent:
No problem. I would love to. I have a really really stupid question.
What I've done is:
1) Checked out the 2.0.x trunk
This is not necessary, you can use a regular Maven release.
2) Built a new maven-javadoc-plugin
3) Used mvn deploy:deploy-file to in
Hey Vincent:
No problem. I would love to. I have a really really stupid question.
What I've done is:
1) Checked out the 2.0.x trunk
2) Built a new maven-javadoc-plugin
3) Used mvn deploy:deploy-file to install it on my test machine
4) Change my project's pom file that uses javadoc to includ
Alexander,
Please open an issue, and if you want propose a patch :)
I guess that the pattern used should also work with -J-version
Vincent
2008/2/10, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Exactly. The use of "-fullversion" is really for internal use as per
> Benjamin and typically the format is
Exactly. The use of "-fullversion" is really for internal use as per
Benjamin and typically the format is "java version " or something
of that elk which is very easy to parse. Again, I would rely on the
javadocVersion tag as a backup.
Thanks!
-aps
On Feb 10, 2008 3:22 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EM
Is there any reason again why it can't use "-version?"
-version gives a lot of unuseful informations.
The unuseful information should not be a problem for the version parsing. On
the other hand, "-fullversion" is "for internal use only" according to [0]
so it seems wise to switch to "-version
2008/2/10, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Wayne/Devlist:
> I guess this should be on the developers list so I'm switching gears (please
> include my email in any response since I'm not on the dev list yet):
>
> When the javadoc plugin attempts to grab the javadoc binaries version in the
>
Hi Wayne/Devlist:
I guess this should be on the developers list so I'm switching gears (please
include my email in any response since I'm not on the dev list yet):
When the javadoc plugin attempts to grab the javadoc binaries version in the
JavadocUtil.getJavadocVersion() it attempts to execute:
