The ability to run multiple providers within a single execution is a
fairly new feature, and
I'm not surprised that works as expected.
There are hundreds of blog posts out there that explain how to run
testng/junit using multiple executions of surefire,
which was the best available method at the t
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 10:57:16 -0600
> Subject: Re: Maven 2/3 and Cobetura plugin with both TestNG and JUnit tests
> (with Surefire plugin configuration)
> From: lar...@gmail.com
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Larry Shatzer, Jr. wrote:
> > I want to
One last update. If I remove the sections that tell
Surefire to run both TestNG and Junit, and put dependencies on the
Surefire Plugin like so:
org.apache.maven.surefire
surefire-junit4
${surefire.version}
o
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Larry Shatzer, Jr. wrote:
> I want to run with both JUnit and TestNG. By removing JUnit (and the
> tests that JUnit run), it ran just fine, as do the inverse, just JUnit
> and no TestNG. It is the combination of both of them.
>
> To help, instead of having gists, I
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
>
> Larry-
>
> try loading both dependencies in your local repository and running offline
> with mvn -o (at least your dependencies will be found)
>
> did you check cobertura for errors?
>
> mvn -e -X cobertura:cobertura -Dquiet=true
I did no
n'aura pas n'importe
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:32:43 -0600
> Subject: Maven 2/3 and Cobetura plu
I did send this to the users list, but got no response in over a week.
I know dev lists are not a magical escalation path, but this might be
a better venue for this email.
I have an example project at https://gist.github.com/1090223
This project has both a JUnit test and a TestNG test. Following
